Dominant Designs for Wings of Airborne Wind Energy Systems

被引：2

作者：

van der Burg, Silke ^{[1
]}

Jurg, Maarten F. M. ^{[1
]}

Tadema, Flore M. ^{[1
]}

Kamp, Linda M. ^{[1
]}

van de Kaa, Geerten ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Technol Policy & Management, NL-2628 BX Delft, Netherlands

来源：

ENERGIES | 2022年 / 15卷 / 19期

关键词：

standards battles; dominant design; best worst method; BWM; airborne wind energy systems; AWE; TECHNOLOGY SUCCESS; STANDARDS; COMPETITION; INDUSTRIES; DYNAMICS; BATTLES; MODEL; COMMUNICATION; INNOVATION; STRATEGY;

D O I：

10.3390/en15197291

中图分类号：

TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];

学科分类号：

0807 ; 0820 ;

摘要：

This paper focuses on the design of the wings used in airborne wind energy systems. At the moment, two different designs are being developed: soft wings and rigid wings. This paper aimed to establish which of the two alternative design choices has the highest chance of dominance and which factors affect that. We treated this problem as a battle for a dominant design, of which the outcome can be explained by factors for technology dominance. The objective was to find weights for the factors for technology dominance for this specific case. This was accomplished by applying the best worst method (BWM). The results are based on literature research and interviews with experts from different backgrounds. It was found that the factors of technological superiority, learning orientation and flexibility are the most important for this case. In addition, it appeared that both designs still have a chance to win the battle.

引用

页数：11