High-pressure pulsatile lavage propagates bacteria into soft tissue

被引:93
作者
Hassinger, SM [1 ]
Harding, G [1 ]
Wongworawat, MD [1 ]
机构
[1] Loma Linda Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Loma Linda, CA 92354 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.blo.0000182246.37454.b2
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Initial wound treatment is critical in the treatment of open fractures, contaminated wounds, and abscesses.(19) Ample evidence suggests that high-pressure pulsatile lavage damages bone structure and disrupts soft tissue. We compared the depth of penetration and amount of retention of bacteria in contaminated soft tissue subjected to one of two lavage methods: high-pressure pulsatile and low-pressure gravity flow. Fresh ovine muscle was harvested, contaminated with fluorescently stained Staphylococcus aureus, and subjected to lavage treatment. Specimens in each lavage method group were subdivided based on orientation across or in line with the muscle fibers. High-pressure lavage causes increased depth of bacterial penetration (across: 3,835 mu m; in line: 4,220 mu m) when compared with low-pressure lavage (across: 1,680 mu m; in line: 2,095 mu m). Furthermore, both high-pressure treatment groups had higher numbers of retained bacteria as counted in 50 mu m x 7,500 pm x 5 pm sections of tissue after lavage (across: 197; in line: 188) when compared with the low-pressure groups (across: 94; in line: 40). These results show that high-pressure pulsatile lavage causes deeper penetration of bacteria and results in greater bacterial retention in soft tissue when compared with low-pressure lavage.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 31
页数:5
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   The biomechanical effect of high-pressure irrigation on diaphyseal fracture healing in vivo [J].
Adili, A ;
Bhandari, M ;
Schemitsch, EH .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2002, 16 (06) :413-417
[2]  
Anglen J O, 2001, J Am Acad Orthop Surg, V9, P219
[3]  
Anglen JO, 2003, INT ORTHOP, V27, P40
[4]   Saline wound irrigation reduces the postoperative infection rate in guinea pigs [J].
Badia, JM ;
Torres, JM ;
Tur, C ;
SitgesSerra, A .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 1996, 63 (02) :457-459
[5]   Lavage of contaminated surfaces: An in vitro evaluation of the effectiveness of different systems [J].
Bahrs, C ;
Schnabel, M ;
Frank, T ;
Zapf, C ;
Mutters, R ;
von Garrel, T .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2003, 112 (01) :26-30
[6]  
Belzunegui J, 2000, CLIN EXP RHEUMATOL, V18, P383
[7]   High pressure pulsatile lavage of contaminated human tibiae: An in vitro study [J].
Bhandari, M ;
Adili, A ;
Lachowski, RJ .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 1998, 12 (07) :479-484
[8]   High and low pressure pulsatile lavage of contaminated tibial fractures: An in vitro study of bacterial adherence and bone damage [J].
Bhandari, M ;
Schemitsch, EH ;
Adili, A ;
Lachowski, RJ ;
Shaughnessy, SG .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 1999, 13 (08) :526-533
[9]   The efficacy of low-pressure lavage with different irrigating solutions to remove adherent bacteria from bone [J].
Bhandari, M ;
Adili, A ;
Schemitsch, EH .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2001, 83A (03) :412-419
[10]   High-pressure pulsatile lavage causes soft tissue damage [J].
Boyd, JI ;
Wongworawat, MD .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2004, (427) :13-17