Verbal long-term memory is enhanced by retrieval practice but impaired by prefrontal direct current stimulation

被引:14
作者
Brunye, Tad T. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Smith, Amy M. [1 ]
Horner, Carlene B. [1 ]
Thomas, Ayanna K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Tufts Univ, Ctr Appl Brain & Cognit Sci, Medford, MA 02155 USA
[2] Tufts Univ, Dept Psychol, Medford, MA 02155 USA
[3] US Army Natick Soldier RDEC, Cognit Sci, Natick, MA 01760 USA
关键词
Direct current stimulation; Retrieval practice; Testing effect; Verbal episodic memory; BRAIN-STIMULATION; WORKING-MEMORY; MOTOR CORTEX; HD-TDCS; EXCITABILITY; NEUROSCIENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.bandc.2018.09.008
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Retrieval practice involves repeatedly testing a student during the learning experience, reliably conferring learning advantages relative to repeated study. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dIPFC) has also been shown to confer learning advantages for verbal memory, though research is equivocal. The present study examined the effects of retrieval versus study practice with or without left dIPFC tDCS on verbal episodic memory. Participants (N = 150) experienced either retrieval practice or study practice, and active anodal, active cathodal, or sham tDCS while encoding word lists, and then returned two days later for a final recall test. Three primary patterns emerged: first, during encoding, tDCS did not influence recall rates in the retrieval practice group. Second, during final recall, participants in the retrieval practice groups recalled more than those in the study practice groups. Finally, during final recall, anodal tDCS decreased recall relative to sham and cathodal stimulation, suggesting that it interfered with developing highly detailed memories that could be relied upon for subsequent recollection. Data support existing research demonstrating the effectiveness of retrieval practice as a learning strategy, but also suggest that anodal dIPFC stimulation can induce long-term negative impacts on verbal episodic memory retrieval.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 88
页数:9
相关论文
共 114 条
[1]   Examining the Testing Effect with Open- and Closed-Book Tests [J].
Agarwal, Pooja K. ;
Karpicke, Jeffrey D. ;
Kang, Sean H. K. ;
Roediger, Henry L., III ;
McDermott, Kathleen B. .
APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 22 (07) :861-876
[2]   Manipulation of phosphene thresholds by transcranial direct current stimulation in man [J].
Antal, A ;
Kincses, TZ ;
Nitsche, MA ;
Paulus, W .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2003, 150 (03) :375-378
[3]   Toward unraveling reading-related modulations of tDCS-induced neuroplasticity in the human visual cortex [J].
Antal, Andrea ;
Ambrus, Geza Gergely ;
Chaieb, Leila .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 5
[4]  
BARKER AT, 1985, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V369, pP3
[5]   Partially non-linear stimulation intensity-dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans [J].
Batsikadze, G. ;
Moliadze, V. ;
Paulus, W. ;
Kuo, M. -F. ;
Nitsche, M. A. .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2013, 591 (07) :1987-2000
[6]   tDCS selectively improves working memory in older adults with more education [J].
Berryhill, Marian E. ;
Jones, Kevin T. .
NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2012, 521 (02) :148-151
[7]   Understanding the behavioural consequences of noninvasive brain stimulation [J].
Bestmann, Sven ;
de Berker, Archy O. ;
Bonaiuto, James .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2015, 19 (01) :13-20
[8]   Cerebellar tDCS Effects on Conditioned Eyeblinks using Different Electrode Placements and Stimulation Protocols [J].
Beyer, Linda ;
Batsikadze, Giorgi ;
Timmann, Dagmar ;
Gerwig, Marcus .
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2017, 11
[9]   Originsof specificity during tDCS: anatomical, activity-selective, and input-bias mechanisms [J].
Bikson, Marom ;
Rahman, Asif .
FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 7
[10]  
Bjork R., 1975, Information processing and cognition: The Loyola Symposium