Negotiating Plausibility: Intervening in the Future of Nanotechnology

被引:63
作者
Selin, Cynthia [1 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Tempe, AZ 85069 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Plausibility; Deliberation; Social implications of nanotechnology; Foresight;
D O I
10.1007/s11948-011-9315-x
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The national-level scenarios project NanoFutures focuses on the social, political, economic, and ethical implications of nanotechnology, and is initiated by the Center for Nanotechnology in Society at Arizona State University (CNS-ASU). The project involves novel methods for the development of plausible visions of nanotechnology-enabled futures, elucidates public preferences for various alternatives, and, using such preferences, helps refine future visions for research and outreach. In doing so, the NanoFutures project aims to address a central question: how to deliberate the social implications of an emergent technology whose outcomes are not known. The solution pursued by the NanoFutures project is twofold. First, NanoFutures limits speculation about the technology to plausible visions. This ambition introduces a host of concerns about the limits of prediction, the nature of plausibility, and how to establish plausibility. Second, it subjects these visions to democratic assessment by a range of stakeholders, thus raising methodological questions as to who are relevant stakeholders and how to activate different communities so as to engage the far future. This article makes the dilemmas posed by decisions about such methodological issues transparent and therefore articulates the role of plausibility in anticipatory governance.
引用
收藏
页码:723 / 737
页数:15
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Contested futures: A sociology of prospective techno-science, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315259420
[2]  
[Anonymous], HARVARD BUSINESS SCH
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order
[4]   COMPETING TECHNOLOGIES, INCREASING RETURNS, AND LOCK-IN BY HISTORICAL EVENTS [J].
ARTHUR, WB .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1989, 99 (394) :116-131
[5]  
Barben D, 2007, HANDBOOK OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY STUDIES, THIRD EDITION, P979
[6]  
Bell W., 2003, Foundations of futures studies. Volume 1 History, purposes, and knowledge Volume 2 and Values, objectivity, and the good society
[7]  
Bennett I, 2008, YEARB NANOTECHNOL SO, V1, P149, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-8416-4_12
[8]  
Collingridge D., 1982, SOCIAL CONTROL TECHN
[9]  
Fisher E., 2006, Science and Public Policy, V33, P5, DOI DOI 10.3152/147154306781779181
[10]  
Funtowicz S. O., 1990, Uncertainty and quality in science for policy, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-009-0621-1_3