Three-Tesla Imaging of the Pituitary and Parasellar Region: T1-Weighted 3-Dimensional Fast Spin Echo Cube Outperforms Conventional 2-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

被引:1
作者
Lien, Ruby J. [1 ]
Corcuera-Solano, Idoia [1 ]
Pawha, Puneet S. [1 ]
Naidich, Thomas P. [1 ]
Tanenbaum, Lawrence N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Neuroradiol, New York, NY 10029 USA
关键词
MRI; pituitary; parasellar; 3D; 2D; Cube; CAVERNOUS SINUS INVASION; EXPERIENCE; SELLAR; TUMORS; MRI;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: We explored how a novel T1-weighted 3-dimensional (3D) fast spin echo (FSE) sequence (Cube; GE, Waukesha, Wis) might outperform conventional 2-dimensional (2D) FSE techniques for contrast-enhanced imaging of the pituitary and parasellar region. Methods: Ninety-one patients were imaged with 3D Cube and conventional 2DFSE on a 3.0-Tmagnetic resonance scanner. Two neuroradiologists independently assessed images for anatomical delineation (infundibulum, optic apparatus, and cavernous sinus), degree of artifact, and confidence in lesion definition or exclusion using a 5-point scale. In addition, the readers were asked to rank overall preference. Results: Readers A and B found 3D Cube to be better or equal to 2D FSE in 84% and 86% of the cases. Three-dimensional Cube provided significantly better images than 2D FSE with respect to delineation of the infundibulum (P < 0.0001), cavernous sinus (P < 0.0001), optic apparatus (P = 0.002 for reader A and P = 0.265 for reader B), and fewer artifacts at the sellar floor (P < 0.0001). Three-dimensional Cube provided greater lesion conspicuity or confidence in lesion exclusion (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: Three-dimensional Cube provides superior quality with thinner slices as well as diminished artifact and can replace conventional 2D FSE sequences for routine evaluations of the pituitary and parasellar region.
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 333
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO AND SECTION THICKNESS IN TWO-DIMENSIONAL VERSUS 3-DIMENSIONAL FOURIER-TRANSFORM MR IMAGING
    CARLSON, J
    CROOKS, L
    ORTENDAHL, D
    KRAMER, DM
    KAUFMAN, L
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1988, 166 (01) : 266 - 270
  • [2] Evaluation of the Sellar and Parasellar Regions
    Chin, Brian M.
    Orlandi, Richard R.
    Wiggins, Richard H., III
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2012, 20 (03) : 515 - +
  • [3] Cavernous sinus invasion by pituitary adenoma: MR imaging
    Cottier, JP
    Destrieux, C
    Brunereau, L
    Bertrand, P
    Moreau, L
    Jan, M
    Herbreteau, D
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2000, 215 (02) : 463 - 469
  • [4] Evaluation of the Pituitary Gland Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Tl-Weighted vs. VIBE Imaging
    Davis, M. A.
    Castillo, M.
    [J]. NEURORADIOLOGY JOURNAL, 2013, 26 (03) : 297 - 300
  • [5] Pituitary Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Sellar and Parasellar Masses: Ten-Year Experience in 2598 Patients
    Famini, Pouyan
    Maya, Marcel M.
    Melmed, Shlomo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2011, 96 (06) : 1633 - 1641
  • [6] Parallel MR imaging: A user's guide
    Glockner, JF
    Hu, HH
    Stanley, DW
    Angelos, L
    King, K
    [J]. RADIOGRAPHICS, 2005, 25 (05) : 1279 - 1297
  • [7] Hashemi IL H., 2010, MRI THE BASICS
  • [8] Imaging the Pituitary and Parasellar Region
    Hess, Christopher P.
    Dillon, William P.
    [J]. NEUROSURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2012, 23 (04) : 529 - +
  • [9] Three-dimensional gradient echo versus spin echo sequence in contrast-enhanced imaging of the pituitary gland at 3 T
    Kakite, Suguru
    Fujii, Shinya
    Kurosaki, Masamichi
    Kanasaki, Yoshiko
    Matsusue, Eiji
    Kaminou, Toshio
    Ogawa, Toshihide
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2011, 79 (01) : 108 - 112
  • [10] MEASUREMENT OF OBSERVER AGREEMENT FOR CATEGORICAL DATA
    LANDIS, JR
    KOCH, GG
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1977, 33 (01) : 159 - 174