Research and development in drug innovation: reflections from the 2013 bioeconomy conference in China, lessons learned and future perspectives

被引:16
作者
Liu, Changxiao [1 ]
Constantinides, Panayiotis P. [2 ]
Li, Yazhuo [1 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Inst Pharmaceut Res, Tianjin 300193, Peoples R China
[2] Biopharmaceut & Drug Delivery Consulting LLC, Gurnee, IL 60031 USA
关键词
Bioeconomy; Biomedicine; Drug development; Innovation; Research and development; Strategy and models;
D O I
10.1016/j.apsb.2014.01.002
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
The enormous progress biotechnology, bioinformatics and nanotechnology made in recent years provides opportunities and scientific framework for development of biomedicine and constitutes a paradigm shift in pharmaceutical R&D and drug innovation. By analyzing the data and related information at R&D level over the past decades, developmental tendency and R&D patterns were summarized. We found that a growing number of biologics in the pipeline of pharma companies with successful products already in the market though, small molecular entities have primarily dominated drug innovation. Additionally, small/medium size companies will continue to play a key role in the development of small molecule drugs and biologics in a multi-channel integrated process. More importantly, modern and effective R&D strategies in biomedicine development to predict and evaluate efficacy and/or safety of 21st century therapeutics are urgently needed. To face new challenges, developmental strategies were proposed, in terms of molecular targeted medicine, generic drugs, new drug delivery system and protein-based drugs. Under the current circumstances, interdisciplinary cooperation mode and policy related to drug innovation in China were deeply discussed as well. (C) 2014 Chinese Pharmaceutical Association and Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 119
页数:8
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Therapeutic Antibodies Against Cancer
    Adler, Mark J.
    Dimitrov, Dimiter S.
    [J]. HEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2012, 26 (03) : 447 - +
  • [2] Can literature analysis identify innovation drivers in drug discovery?
    Agarwal, Pankaj
    Searls, David B.
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, 2009, 8 (11) : 865 - 878
  • [3] ADME of Antibody-Maytansinoid Conjugates
    Erickson, Hans K.
    Lambert, John M.
    [J]. AAPS JOURNAL, 2012, 14 (04): : 799 - 805
  • [4] Targeted drug delivery for cancer therapy: the other side of antibodies
    Firer, Michael A.
    Gellerman, Gary
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY & ONCOLOGY, 2012, 5
  • [5] Herper M., 2013, The cost of creating a new drug now 5 billion, pushing big pharma to change
  • [6] Computer-aided antibody design
    Kuroda, Daisuke
    Shirai, Hiroki
    Jacobson, Matthew P.
    Nakamura, Haruki
    [J]. PROTEIN ENGINEERING DESIGN & SELECTION, 2012, 25 (10) : 507 - 521
  • [7] Mattheolabakis G, 2012, NANOMEDICINE-UK, V7, P1577, DOI [10.2217/NNM.12.128, 10.2217/nnm.12.128]
  • [8] Lessons from 60 years of pharmaceutical innovation
    Munos, Bernard
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, 2009, 8 (12) : 959 - 968
  • [9] Innovative approaches to clinical development and trial design
    Orloff, John J.
    Stanski, Donald
    [J]. ANNALI DELL ISTITUTO SUPERIORE DI SANITA, 2011, 47 (01): : 8 - 13
  • [10] Challenges in Development of Targeted Liposomal Therapeutics
    Sawant, Rupa R.
    Torchilin, Vladimir P.
    [J]. AAPS JOURNAL, 2012, 14 (02): : 303 - 315