Simulating Moral Actions: An Investigation of Personal Force in Virtual Moral Dilemmas

被引:40
作者
Francis, K. B. [1 ]
Terbeck, S. [2 ]
Briazu, R. A. [2 ]
Haines, A. [3 ]
Gummerum, M. [2 ]
Ganis, G. [2 ]
Howard, I. S. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Reading, Dept Philosophy, Whiteknights Campus, Reading RG6 6AA, Berks, England
[2] Univ Plymouth, Sch Psychol, Plymouth PL4 8AA, Devon, England
[3] Univ Plymouth, Transtechnol Res, Plymouth PL4 8AA, Devon, England
[4] Univ Plymouth, Ctr Robot & Neural Syst, Plymouth PL4 8AA, Devon, England
关键词
JUDGMENT;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-017-13909-9
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Advances in Virtual Reality (VR) technologies allow the investigation of simulated moral actions in visually immersive environments. Using a robotic manipulandum and an interactive sculpture, we now also incorporate realistic haptic feedback into virtual moral simulations. In two experiments, we found that participants responded with greater utilitarian actions in virtual and haptic environments when compared to traditional questionnaire assessments of moral judgments. In experiment one, when incorporating a robotic manipulandum, we found that the physical power of simulated utilitarian responses (calculated as the product of force and speed) was predicted by individual levels of psychopathy. In experiment two, which integrated an interactive and life-like sculpture of a human into a VR simulation, greater utilitarian actions continued to be observed. Together, these results support a disparity between simulated moral action and moral judgment. Overall this research combines state-of-the-art virtual reality, robotic movement simulations, and realistic human sculptures, to enhance moral paradigms that are often contextually impoverished. As such, this combination provides a better assessment of simulated moral action, and illustrates the embodied nature of morally-relevant actions.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   The HEXACO-60: A Short Measure of the Major Dimensions of Personality [J].
Ashton, Michael C. ;
Lee, Kibeom .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2009, 91 (04) :340-345
[2]  
Bartels D. M., 2015, W BLACKWELL HDB JUDG
[3]   Psychopaths know right from wrong but don't care [J].
Cima, Maaike ;
Tonnaer, Franca ;
Hauser, Marc D. .
SOCIAL COGNITIVE AND AFFECTIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2010, 5 (01) :59-67
[4]   The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment: Testing three principles of harm [J].
Cushman, Fiery ;
Young, Liane ;
Hauser, Marc .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2006, 17 (12) :1082-1089
[5]   Action, Outcome, and Value: A Dual-System Framework for Morality [J].
Cushman, Fiery .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2013, 17 (03) :273-292
[6]   Finding faults: How moral dilemmas illuminate cognitive structure [J].
Cushman, Fiery ;
Greene, Joshua D. .
SOCIAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 7 (03) :269-279
[7]   Simulating Murder: The Aversion to Harmful Action [J].
Cushman, Fiery ;
Gray, Kurt ;
Gaffey, Allison ;
Mendes, Wendy Berry .
EMOTION, 2012, 12 (01) :2-7
[8]   The Dark Triad of personality and utilitarian moral judgment: The mediating role of Honesty/Humility and Harm/Care [J].
Djeriouat, Hakim ;
Tremoliere, Bastien .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2014, 67 :11-16
[9]   What we say and what we do: The relationship between real and hypothetical moral choices [J].
FeldmanHall, Oriel ;
Mobbs, Dean ;
Evans, Davy ;
Hiscox, Lucy ;
Navrady, Lauren ;
Dalgleish, Tim .
COGNITION, 2012, 123 (03) :434-441
[10]  
Foot P., 2002, Virtues and vices and other essays in moral philosophy, DOI DOI 10.1093/0199252866.001.0001