共 50 条
Performance of New Thresholds of the Glasgow Blatchford Score in Managing Patients With Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding
被引:100
作者:
Laursen, Stig B.
[1
]
Dalton, Harry R.
[2
]
Murray, Iain A.
[3
]
Michell, Nick
[2
]
Johnston, Matt R.
[4
]
Schultz, Michael
[5
]
Hansen, Jane M.
[1
]
de Muckadell, Ove B. Schaffalitzky
[1
]
Blatchford, Oliver
[6
]
Stanley, Adrian J.
[7
]
机构:
[1] Odense Univ Hosp, Dept Med Gastroenterol, DK-5000 Odense C, Denmark
[2] Royal Cornwall Hosp, Gastrointestinal Unit, Truro, Cornwall, England
[3] Dunedin Publ Hosp, Gastrointestinal Unit, Dunedin, New Zealand
[4] Univ Otago, Dunedin Sch Med, Dunedin, New Zealand
[5] Univ Otago, Dept Med, Dunedin, New Zealand
[6] Univ Glasgow, Dept Publ Hlth, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[7] Glasgow Royal Infirm, Dept Gastroenterol, Glasgow G4 0SF, Lanark, Scotland
关键词:
Outpatient;
Management;
Gastrointestinal Bleeding;
Prognosis;
UGIH;
OUTPATIENT MANAGEMENT;
RISK STRATIFICATION;
ENDOSCOPIC THERAPY;
HEMORRHAGE;
NEED;
VALIDATION;
SYSTEM;
D O I:
10.1016/j.cgh.2014.07.023
中图分类号:
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号:
摘要:
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (UGIH) is a common cause of hospital admission. The Glasgow Blatchford score (GBS) is an accurate determinant of patients' risk for hospital-based intervention or death. Patients with a GBS of 0 are at low risk for poor outcome and could be managed as outpatients. Some investigators therefore have proposed extending the definition of low-risk patients by using a higher GBS cut-off value, possibly with an age adjustment. We compared 3 thresholds of the GBS and 2 age-adjusted modifications to identify the optimal cutoff value or modification. METHODS: We performed an observational study of 2305 consecutive patients presenting with UGIH at 4 centers (Scotland, England, Denmark, and New Zealand). The performance of each threshold and modification was evaluated based on sensitivity and specificity analyses, the proportion of low-risk patients identified, and outcomes of patients classified as low risk. RESULTS: There were differences in age (P = .0001), need for intervention (P < .0001), mortality (P < .015), and GBS (P = . 0001) among sites. All systems identified low-risk patients with high levels of sensitivity (>97%). The GBS at cut-off values of <= 1 and <= 2, and both modifications, identified low-risk patients with higher levels of specificity (40%-49%) than the GBS with a cut-off value of 0 (22% specificity; P < .001). The GBS at a cut-off value of <= 2 had the highest specificity, but 3% of patients classified as low-risk patients had adverse outcomes. All GBS cut-off values, and score modifications, had low levels of specificity when tested in New Zealand (2.5%-11%). CONCLUSIONS: A GBS cut-off value of <= 1 and both GBS modifications identify almost twice as many low-risk patients with UGIH as a GBS at a cut-off value of 0. Implementing a protocol for outpatient management, based on one of these scores, could reduce hospital admissions by 15% to 20%.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / U186
页数:9
相关论文