Performance of New Thresholds of the Glasgow Blatchford Score in Managing Patients With Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

被引:100
作者
Laursen, Stig B. [1 ]
Dalton, Harry R. [2 ]
Murray, Iain A. [3 ]
Michell, Nick [2 ]
Johnston, Matt R. [4 ]
Schultz, Michael [5 ]
Hansen, Jane M. [1 ]
de Muckadell, Ove B. Schaffalitzky [1 ]
Blatchford, Oliver [6 ]
Stanley, Adrian J. [7 ]
机构
[1] Odense Univ Hosp, Dept Med Gastroenterol, DK-5000 Odense C, Denmark
[2] Royal Cornwall Hosp, Gastrointestinal Unit, Truro, Cornwall, England
[3] Dunedin Publ Hosp, Gastrointestinal Unit, Dunedin, New Zealand
[4] Univ Otago, Dunedin Sch Med, Dunedin, New Zealand
[5] Univ Otago, Dept Med, Dunedin, New Zealand
[6] Univ Glasgow, Dept Publ Hlth, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[7] Glasgow Royal Infirm, Dept Gastroenterol, Glasgow G4 0SF, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
Outpatient; Management; Gastrointestinal Bleeding; Prognosis; UGIH; OUTPATIENT MANAGEMENT; RISK STRATIFICATION; ENDOSCOPIC THERAPY; HEMORRHAGE; NEED; VALIDATION; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.cgh.2014.07.023
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (UGIH) is a common cause of hospital admission. The Glasgow Blatchford score (GBS) is an accurate determinant of patients' risk for hospital-based intervention or death. Patients with a GBS of 0 are at low risk for poor outcome and could be managed as outpatients. Some investigators therefore have proposed extending the definition of low-risk patients by using a higher GBS cut-off value, possibly with an age adjustment. We compared 3 thresholds of the GBS and 2 age-adjusted modifications to identify the optimal cutoff value or modification. METHODS: We performed an observational study of 2305 consecutive patients presenting with UGIH at 4 centers (Scotland, England, Denmark, and New Zealand). The performance of each threshold and modification was evaluated based on sensitivity and specificity analyses, the proportion of low-risk patients identified, and outcomes of patients classified as low risk. RESULTS: There were differences in age (P = .0001), need for intervention (P < .0001), mortality (P < .015), and GBS (P = . 0001) among sites. All systems identified low-risk patients with high levels of sensitivity (>97%). The GBS at cut-off values of <= 1 and <= 2, and both modifications, identified low-risk patients with higher levels of specificity (40%-49%) than the GBS with a cut-off value of 0 (22% specificity; P < .001). The GBS at a cut-off value of <= 2 had the highest specificity, but 3% of patients classified as low-risk patients had adverse outcomes. All GBS cut-off values, and score modifications, had low levels of specificity when tested in New Zealand (2.5%-11%). CONCLUSIONS: A GBS cut-off value of <= 1 and both GBS modifications identify almost twice as many low-risk patients with UGIH as a GBS at a cut-off value of 0. Implementing a protocol for outpatient management, based on one of these scores, could reduce hospital admissions by 15% to 20%.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / U186
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Risk Stratification in Cancer Patients with Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Comparison of Glasgow-Blatchford, Rockall and AIMS65, and Development of a New Scoring System
    Franco, Matheus Cavalcante
    Jang, Sunguk
    Martins, Bruno da Costa
    Stevens, Tyler
    Jairath, Vipul
    Lopez, Rocio
    Vargo, John J.
    Barkun, Alan
    Maluf-Filho, Fauze
    CLINICAL ENDOSCOPY, 2022, 55 (02) : 240 - 247
  • [32] Rockall score in predicting outcomes of elderly patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding
    Wang, Chang-Yuan
    Qin, Jian
    Wang, Jing
    Sun, Chang-Yi
    Cao, Tao
    Zhu, Dan-Dan
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 19 (22) : 3466 - 3472
  • [33] Predictive validity of the Glasgow Blatchford Bleeding Score in an unselected emergency department population in continental Europe
    Schiefer, Mart
    Aquarius, Michel
    Leffers, Pieter
    Stassen, Patricia
    van Deursen, Cees
    Oostenbrug, Liekele
    Jansen, Loes
    Masclee, Ad
    Keulemans, Yolande C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2012, 24 (04) : 382 - 387
  • [34] Comparison of AIMS65 and Glasgow Blatchford scores in predicting mortality in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
    Ak, Rohat
    Hokenek, Nihat Mujdat
    REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2021, 67 (05): : 766 - 770
  • [35] Validity of modified early warning, Glasgow Blatchford, and pre-endoscopic Rockall scores in predicting prognosis of patients presenting to emergency department with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
    Bozkurt, Seyran
    Kose, Ataman
    Arslan, Engin Deniz
    Erdogan, Semra
    Ucbilek, Enver
    Cevik, Ibrahim
    Ayrik, Cuneyt
    Sezgin, Orhan
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA RESUSCITATION & EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2015, 23
  • [36] Upper gastrointestinal bleeding: what's the score?
    Reed, B.
    Stanley, A. J.
    SCOTTISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 56 (03) : 167 - 169
  • [37] Validation of a modified Glasgow-Blatchford Score for risk stratification of patients with suspected upper gastrointestinal bleeding in an accident and emergency department in Hong Kong
    Tsui, A. T. S.
    Chau, C. W.
    Leung, J. K. S.
    HONG KONG JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 23 (02) : 3 - 11
  • [38] Comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems for the prediction of the risk of in-hospital death among patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
    Lu, Xuefeng
    Zhang, Xiaojie
    Chen, Hong
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS, 2020, 112 (06) : 467 - 473
  • [39] Comparison of three risk scores to predict outcomes in upper gastrointestinal bleeding; modifying Glasgow-Blatchford with albumin
    Shafaghi, Afshin
    Gharibpoor, Faeze
    Mahdipour, Zahra
    Samadani, Ali Akbar
    ROMANIAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2019, 57 (04) : 322 - 333
  • [40] Comparison of AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford score, and Rockall score in a series of patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a tertiary hospital in Singapore
    Ngdr, Yi Kang
    Kam, Jia Wen
    Ang, Tiing Leong
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2017, 32 : 86 - 87