Performance of New Thresholds of the Glasgow Blatchford Score in Managing Patients With Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

被引:100
作者
Laursen, Stig B. [1 ]
Dalton, Harry R. [2 ]
Murray, Iain A. [3 ]
Michell, Nick [2 ]
Johnston, Matt R. [4 ]
Schultz, Michael [5 ]
Hansen, Jane M. [1 ]
de Muckadell, Ove B. Schaffalitzky [1 ]
Blatchford, Oliver [6 ]
Stanley, Adrian J. [7 ]
机构
[1] Odense Univ Hosp, Dept Med Gastroenterol, DK-5000 Odense C, Denmark
[2] Royal Cornwall Hosp, Gastrointestinal Unit, Truro, Cornwall, England
[3] Dunedin Publ Hosp, Gastrointestinal Unit, Dunedin, New Zealand
[4] Univ Otago, Dunedin Sch Med, Dunedin, New Zealand
[5] Univ Otago, Dept Med, Dunedin, New Zealand
[6] Univ Glasgow, Dept Publ Hlth, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[7] Glasgow Royal Infirm, Dept Gastroenterol, Glasgow G4 0SF, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
Outpatient; Management; Gastrointestinal Bleeding; Prognosis; UGIH; OUTPATIENT MANAGEMENT; RISK STRATIFICATION; ENDOSCOPIC THERAPY; HEMORRHAGE; NEED; VALIDATION; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.cgh.2014.07.023
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (UGIH) is a common cause of hospital admission. The Glasgow Blatchford score (GBS) is an accurate determinant of patients' risk for hospital-based intervention or death. Patients with a GBS of 0 are at low risk for poor outcome and could be managed as outpatients. Some investigators therefore have proposed extending the definition of low-risk patients by using a higher GBS cut-off value, possibly with an age adjustment. We compared 3 thresholds of the GBS and 2 age-adjusted modifications to identify the optimal cutoff value or modification. METHODS: We performed an observational study of 2305 consecutive patients presenting with UGIH at 4 centers (Scotland, England, Denmark, and New Zealand). The performance of each threshold and modification was evaluated based on sensitivity and specificity analyses, the proportion of low-risk patients identified, and outcomes of patients classified as low risk. RESULTS: There were differences in age (P = .0001), need for intervention (P < .0001), mortality (P < .015), and GBS (P = . 0001) among sites. All systems identified low-risk patients with high levels of sensitivity (>97%). The GBS at cut-off values of <= 1 and <= 2, and both modifications, identified low-risk patients with higher levels of specificity (40%-49%) than the GBS with a cut-off value of 0 (22% specificity; P < .001). The GBS at a cut-off value of <= 2 had the highest specificity, but 3% of patients classified as low-risk patients had adverse outcomes. All GBS cut-off values, and score modifications, had low levels of specificity when tested in New Zealand (2.5%-11%). CONCLUSIONS: A GBS cut-off value of <= 1 and both GBS modifications identify almost twice as many low-risk patients with UGIH as a GBS at a cut-off value of 0. Implementing a protocol for outpatient management, based on one of these scores, could reduce hospital admissions by 15% to 20%.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / U186
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford score, and Rockall score in a European series of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: performance when predicting in-hospital and delayed mortality
    Martinez-Cara, Juan G.
    Jimenez-Rosales, Rita
    Ubeda-Munoz, Margarita
    Lopez de Hierro, Mercedes
    de Teresa, Javier
    Redondo-Cerezo, Eduardo
    UNITED EUROPEAN GASTROENTEROLOGY JOURNAL, 2016, 4 (03) : 371 - 379
  • [22] External validation and comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford score, modified Glasgow-Blatchford score, Rockall score and AIMS65 score in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a cross-sectional observational study in Western Switzerland
    Rivieri, Sirio
    Carron, Pierre-Nicolas
    Schoepfer, Alain
    Ageron, Francois-Xavier
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2023, 30 (01) : 32 - 39
  • [23] AIMS65 scoring system is comparable to Glasgow-Blatchford score or Rockall score for prediction of clinical outcomes for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding
    Kim, Min Seong
    Choi, Jeongmin
    Shin, Won Chang
    BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [24] The AIMS65 score compared with the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting outcomes in upper GI bleeding
    Hyett, Brian H.
    Abougergi, Marwan S.
    Charpentier, Joseph P.
    Kumar, Navin L.
    Brozovic, Suzana
    Claggett, Brian L.
    Travis, Anne C.
    Saltzman, John R.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2013, 77 (04) : 551 - 557
  • [25] A modified Glasgow Blatchford Score improves risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleed: a prospective comparison of scoring systems
    Cheng, D. W.
    Lu, Y. W.
    Teller, T.
    Sekhon, H. K.
    Wu, B. U.
    ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2012, 36 (08) : 782 - 789
  • [26] VALIDATION OF THE GLASGOW-BLATCHFORD SCORE AND THE PRE-ENDOSCOPIC ROCKALL SCORE FOR PREDICTING ACTIVE GASTROINTESTINAL BLEEDING IN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT PATIENTS WITH SUSPECTED UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL BLEEDING
    Lee, D. W.
    Park, Y. S.
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2014, 40 : S230 - S231
  • [27] SAFE DISCHARGE OF PATIENTS WITH LOW-RISK UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL BLEEDING (UGIB): CAN USE OF GLASGOW-BLATCHFORD BLEEDING SCORE (GBS) BE EXTENDED?
    Le Jeune, I. R.
    Gordon, A.
    Farrugia, D.
    Manwani, R.
    Guha, N.
    James, M. W.
    GUT, 2011, 60
  • [28] Is the Glasgow Blatchford score useful in the risk assessment of patients presenting with variceal haemorrhage?
    Reed, Elizabeth A.
    Dalton, Harry
    Blatchford, Oliver
    Ashley, Dawn
    Mowat, Craig
    Gaya, Daniel R.
    Cahill, Aiden
    Warshow, Ursula
    Hare, Nicola
    Groome, Maximillion
    Forrest, Ewan H.
    Morris, John
    Stanley, Adrian J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2014, 26 (04) : 432 - 437
  • [29] External validation of the Glasgow-Blatchford Bleeding Score and the Rockall Score in the US setting
    Chandra, Subhash
    Hess, Erik P.
    Agarwal, Dipti
    Nestler, David M.
    Montori, Victor M.
    Song, Louis M. Wong Kee
    Wells, George A.
    Stiell, Ian G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2012, 30 (05) : 673 - 679
  • [30] Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 Scoring Systems for Risk Stratification in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in the Emergency Department
    Yaka, Elif
    Yilmaz, Serkan
    Dogan, Nurettin Ozgur
    Pekdemir, Murat
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2015, 22 (01) : 22 - 30