Pathologic Staging Inconsistency Between ypT4N0 (stage II) and ypT1-2N1 (stage III) After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy and Total Mesorectal Excision in Rectal Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Study

被引:3
作者
Lee, Joo Hwan [1 ]
Yu, Mina [2 ]
Kim, Sung Hwan [1 ]
Lee, Jong Hoon [1 ]
Sung, Soo-Yoon [1 ]
Jeong, Bae Kwon [3 ,4 ]
Jeong, Songmi [5 ]
Nam, Taek Keun [6 ]
Jeong, Jae Uk [6 ]
Jang, Hong Seok [7 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Ctr Colorectal Canc, St Vincents Hosp, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Catholic Univ Korea, Dept Radiat Oncol, Bucheon St Marys Hosp, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Gyeongsang Natl Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Sch Med, Jinju, South Korea
[4] Gyeongsang Natl Univ Hosp, Jinju, South Korea
[5] Ewha Womans Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Sch Med, Seoul, South Korea
[6] Chonnam Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Hwasun, South Korea
[7] Catholic Univ Korea, Seoul St Marys Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Chemoradiation; Pathologic stage; Prognosis; Rectal cancer; Survival; CIRCUMFERENTIAL MARGIN; LOCAL RECURRENCE; T-STAGE; RADIOTHERAPY; SURVIVAL; TUMOR; CARCINOMA; RESECTION; SURGERY; RELAPSE;
D O I
10.1016/j.clcc.2018.11.003
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Patients with rectal cancer patients with ypT4N0 (stage II) showed worse recurrence-free survival than those with ypT1-2N1 (stage III). Patients staging ypT4N0 (stage II) had significantly higher locoregional recurrence and distant metastasis rates than those staging ypT1-2N1 (stage III). ypT4N0 (stages II) should be classified to a higher stage in the rectal cancer staging system. Background: In the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results population-based data, the survival curves reversed between T4N0 (stages IIB or IIC) and T1-2N1 (stage IIIA) in rectal cancer. However, T4N0 had a higher stage than T1-2N1 in the current colorectal staging system. Patients and Methods: We analyzed 1804 patients with rectal cancer who were treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy and curative surgery. We grouped patients by pathologic stage, and recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival rates were calculated and compared for each stage. We evaluated prognostic factors that influenced recurrence and survival. Results: In the recurrence and survival analysis, 3-year RFS rates were 95.9% for ypStage 0, 94.0% for ypStage I, 78.9% for ypStage IIA, 55.8% for ypStage IIB/C, 80.2% for ypStage IIIA, 64.6% for ypStage IIIB, and 44.9% for ypStage IIIC. Patients with ypStage IIB/C showed significantly worse RFS (P = .004) than did those with ypStage IIIA. The ypStage IIB/C group showed significantly higher rates of both locoregional recurrence (24.3% vs. 5.5%; P = .02) and distant metastasis (31.6% vs. 17.1%; P = .048) than did the ypStage IIIA group. Compared with ypStage IIIA, ypStage IIB/C showed significantly higher pre-chemoradiotherapy carcinoembryonic antigen (P = .004), circumferential radial margin involvement (P = .001), and positive perineural invasion (P = .014). Conclusion: Patients with rectal cancer staged ypT4N0 were associated with higher locoregional recurrence and distant metastasis rates than those staged ypT1-2N1 in the current staging system. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:E130 / E139
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Amin M.B., 2017, AJCC CANC STAGING MA, VVIII ed.
  • [2] Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer and impact on outcomes - A population-based study
    Asli, Linn M.
    Johannesen, Tom B.
    Myklebust, Tor A.
    Moller, Bjorn
    Eriksen, Morten Tandberg
    Guren, Marianne Gronlie
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2017, 123 (03) : 446 - 453
  • [3] Importance of tumor regression assessment in predicting the outcome in patients with locally advanced rectal carcinoma who are treated with preoperative radiotherapy
    Bouzourene, H
    Bosman, FT
    Seelentag, W
    Matter, M
    Coucke, P
    [J]. CANCER, 2002, 94 (04) : 1121 - 1130
  • [4] The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual and the Future of TNM
    Edge, Stephen B.
    Compton, Carolyn C.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 17 (06) : 1471 - 1474
  • [5] Revised Tumor and Node Categorization for Rectal Cancer Based on Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results and Rectal Pooled Analysis Outcomes
    Gunderson, Leonard L.
    Jessup, John Milburn
    Sargent, Daniel J.
    Greene, Frederick L.
    Stewart, Andrew
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (02) : 256 - 263
  • [6] Impact of T and N stage and treatment on survival and relapse in adjuvant rectal cancer: A pooled analysis
    Gunderson, LL
    Sargent, DJ
    Tepper, JE
    Wolmark, N
    O'Connell, MJ
    Begovic, M
    Allmer, C
    Colangelo, L
    Smalley, SR
    Haller, DG
    Martenson, JA
    Mayer, RJ
    Rich, TA
    Ajani, JA
    MacDonald, JS
    Willett, CG
    Goldberg, RM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (10) : 1785 - 1796
  • [7] Impact of T and N substage on survival and disease relapse in adjuvant rectal cancer: A pooled analysis
    Gunderson, LL
    Sargent, DJ
    Tepper, JE
    O'Connell, MJ
    Allmer, C
    Smalley, SR
    Martenson, JA
    Haller, DG
    Mayer, RJ
    Rich, TA
    Ajani, JA
    MacDonald, JS
    Goldberg, RM
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2002, 54 (02): : 386 - 396
  • [8] THE MESORECTUM IN RECTAL-CANCER SURGERY - THE CLUE TO PELVIC RECURRENCE
    HEALD, RJ
    HUSBAND, EM
    RYALL, RDH
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1982, 69 (10) : 613 - 616
  • [9] The survival and clinicopathological differences between patients with stage IIIA and stage II rectal cancer: An analysis of 12,036 patients in the SEER database
    Huang, Ben
    Mo, Shaobo
    Zhu, Liang
    Xu, Tianhong
    Cai, Guoxiang
    [J]. ONCOTARGET, 2016, 7 (48) : 79773 - 79782
  • [10] Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer
    Kapiteijn, E
    Marijnen, CAM
    Nagtegaal, ID
    Putter, H
    Steup, WH
    Wiggers, T
    Rutten, HJT
    Pahlman, L
    Glimelius, B
    van Krieken, JHJM
    Leer, JWH
    van de Velde, CJH
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 345 (09) : 638 - 646