Electric Vehicles in China: Emissions and Health Impacts

被引:175
作者
Ji, Shuguang [1 ]
Cherry, Christopher R. [1 ]
Bechle, Matthew J. [2 ]
Wu, Ye [3 ]
Marshall, Julian D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Dept Civil Engn, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[3] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Environm, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ANALYSIS; AIR-POLLUTION EXPOSURE; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; INTAKE FRACTION; POWER GENERATION; BENEFITS; ENERGY; PLANTS; BIKES; USERS;
D O I
10.1021/es202347q
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
E-bikes in China are the single largest adoption of alternative fuel vehicles in history, with more than 100 million e-bikes purchased in the past decade and vehicle ownership about 2X larger for e-bikes as for conventional cars; e-car sales, too, are rapidly growing. We compare emissions (CO2, PM2.5, NOx, HC) and environmental health impacts (primary PM2.5) from the use of conventional vehicles (CVs) and electric vehicles (EVs) in 34 major cities in China. CO2 emissions (g km(-1)) vary and are an order of magnitude greater for e-cars (135-274) and CVs (150-180) than for e-bikes (14-27). PM2.5 emission factors generally are lower for CVs (gasoline or diesel) than comparable EVs. However, intake fraction is often greater for CVs than for EVs because combustion emissions are generally closer to population centers for CVs (tailpipe emissions) than for EVs (power plant emissions). For most cities, the net result is that primary PM2.5 environmental health impacts per passenger-km are greater for e-cars than for gasoline cars (3.6x on average), lower than for diesel cars (2.5X on average), and equal to diesel buses. In contrast, e-bikes yield lower environmental health impacts per passenger-km than the three CVs investigated: gasoline cars (2x), diesel cars (10X), and diesel buses (5x). Our findings highlight the importance of considering exposures, and especially the proximity of emissions to people, when evaluating environmental health impacts for EVs.
引用
收藏
页码:2018 / 2024
页数:7
相关论文
共 52 条
[31]   Air pollution threatens the health of children in China [J].
Millman, Alexander ;
Tang, Deliang ;
Perera, Frederica P. .
PEDIATRICS, 2008, 122 (03) :620-628
[32]   An environmental justice analysis of British air quality [J].
Mitchell, G ;
Dorling, D .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A-ECONOMY AND SPACE, 2003, 35 (05) :909-929
[33]   Measuring the damages of air pollution in the United States [J].
Muller, Nicholas Z. ;
Mendelsohn, Robert .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2007, 54 (01) :1-14
[34]   Effects of electric vehicles (EV) on environmental loads with consideration of regional differences of electric power generation and charging characteristic of EV users in Japan [J].
Nansai, K ;
Tohno, S ;
Kono, M ;
Kasahara, M .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2002, 71 (02) :111-125
[35]  
Oliver H., 2009, USE VEHICLE EMISSION
[36]  
Ott WR., 2006, Exposure Analysis
[37]   Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution [J].
Pope, CA ;
Burnett, RT ;
Thun, MJ ;
Calle, EE ;
Krewski, D ;
Ito, K ;
Thurston, GD .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 287 (09) :1132-1141
[38]   Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from plug-in hybrid vehicles: Implications for policy [J].
Samaras, Constantine ;
Meisterling, Kyle .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 42 (09) :3170-3176
[39]   Evaluation of energy consumption, emissions and cost of plug-in hybrid vehicles [J].
Silva, Carla ;
Ross, Marc ;
Farias, Tiago .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2009, 50 (07) :1635-1643
[40]   Cost and emissions impacts of plug-in hybrid vehicles on the Ohio power system [J].
Sioshansi, Ramteen ;
Fagiani, Riccardo ;
Marano, Vincenzo .
ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (11) :6703-6712