Implementation and evaluation of a nurse-led decision-coaching program for healthy breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA1/2) mutation carriers: a study protocol for the randomized controlled EDCP-BRCA study

被引:20
作者
Isselhard, A. [1 ]
Toepper, M. [1 ]
Berger-Hoeger, B. [2 ]
Steckelberg, A. [2 ]
Fischer, H. [3 ]
Vitinius, F. [3 ]
Beifus, K. [4 ]
Koeberlein-Neu, J. [4 ]
Wiedemann, R. [5 ,6 ]
Rhiem, K. [5 ,6 ]
Schmutzler, R. [5 ,6 ]
Stock, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Cologne, Inst Hlth Econ & Clin Epidemiol, Cologne, Germany
[2] Martin Luther Univ Halle Wittenberg, Fac Med, Inst Hlth & Nursing Sci, Halle, Saale, Germany
[3] Univ Cologne, Univ Hosp Cologne, Fac Med, Dept Psychosomat & Psychotherapy, Cologne, Germany
[4] Univ Wuppertal, Schumpeter Sch Business & Econ, Ctr Hlth Econ & Hlth Serv Res, Wuppertal, Germany
[5] Univ Cologne, Fac Med, Ctr Familial Breast & Ovarian Canc, Ctr Integrated Oncol CIO, Cologne, Germany
[6] Univ Hosp Cologne, Cologne, Germany
关键词
Decision coaching; BRCA1 and BRCA2; Familial breast cancer; Familial ovarian cancer; Decision aid; Decision making; Patient-centered care; Shared decision-making; PROPHYLACTIC MASTECTOMY; HEREDITARY BREAST; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; EVENT SCALE; WOMEN; RISK; OVARIAN; IMPACT; INTENTION; OOPHORECTOMY;
D O I
10.1186/s13063-020-04431-x
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
BackgroundFemale BRCA mutation carriers have an increased lifetime risk for breast and ovarian cancer compared to the general population. Women who carry this mutation have several options to deal with their cancer risk, such as risk-reducing surgeries or intensified breast cancer screening. Previous research has shown that preferences in this scenario are highly dependent on affected women's personalities and value systems. To support these women in the decision-making process, a structured decision support consisting of decision coaching combined with a decision aid might be helpful.Methods/designA randomized controlled trial will be conducted in order to compare usual care with structured decision support alongside usual care. The decision support program entails nurse-led decision coaching as well as an evidence-based patient decision aid. Nurses are qualified by a 4-day training program in informed decision-making and decision coaching. Six centers for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer in Germany will be included in the study, with a planned sample size of 398 women.The primary outcome is the congruence between the preferred and the actual played role in the decision-making process as measured by the Control Preferences Scale. It is hypothesized that the structured decision support will enable women to play the preferred role in the decision-making process. Secondary outcomes include the knowledge and attitudes about preventive options, decisional conflict, depression and anxiety, coping self-efficacy, impact of event, and self-concept. A process evaluation will accompany the study.DiscussionThe EDCP-BRCA study is the first study to implement and evaluate decision coaching combined with a decision aid for healthy BRCA mutation carriers worldwide.Trial registration {2a}DRKS-ID: DRKS00015527. Registered 30 October 2019.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2019, INT S3 GUID EARL SCR
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, User manual-stage of decision making scale
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, NAT CANC PLAN ACT FI
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2017, COCHRANE DATABASE SY
[5]   Nurse-led coaching of shared decision-making for women with ductal carcinoma in situ in breast care centers: A cluster randomized controlled trial [J].
Berger-Hoeger, Birte ;
Liethmann, Katrin ;
Muehlhauser, Ingrid ;
Haastert, Burkhard ;
Steckelberg, Anke .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2019, 93 :141-152
[6]   Informed shared decision-making supported by decision coaches for women with ductal carcinoma in situ: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial [J].
Berger-Hoeger, Birte ;
Liethmann, Katrin ;
Muehlhauser, Ingrid ;
Haastert, Burkhard ;
Steckelberg, Anke .
TRIALS, 2015, 16
[7]   High-risk breast cancer surveillance with MRI: 10-year experience from the German consortium for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer [J].
Bick, Ulrich ;
Engel, Christoph ;
Krug, Barbara ;
Heindel, Walter ;
Fallenberg, Eva M. ;
Rhiem, Kerstin ;
Maintz, David ;
Golatta, Michael ;
Speiser, Dorothee ;
Rjosk-Dendorfer, Dorothea ;
Laemmer-Skarke, Irina ;
Dietzel, Frederic ;
Schaefer, Karl Werner Fritz ;
Leinert, Elena ;
Weigel, Stefanie ;
Sauer, Stephanie ;
Pertschy, Stefanie ;
Hofmockel, Thomas ;
Hagert-Winkler, Anne ;
Kast, Karin ;
Quante, Anne ;
Meindl, Alfons ;
Kiechle, Marion ;
Loeffler, Markus ;
Schmutzler, Rita K. ;
Blohmer, Jens-Uwe ;
Horn, Denise ;
Varon-Mateeva, Raymonda ;
Huebbel, Verena ;
Herold, Natalie ;
Puesken, Michael ;
Wimberger, Pauline ;
Meisel, Cornelia ;
Keller, Katja ;
Antoch, Gerald ;
Vesper, Anne-Sophie ;
Fehm, Tanja N. ;
Schlegelberger, Brigitte ;
Auber, Bernd ;
Wallaschek, Hannah ;
Heil, Joerg ;
Schott, Sarah ;
Dikow, Nicola ;
Mundhenke, Christoph ;
Arnold, Norbert ;
Caliebe, Almuth ;
Briest, Susanne ;
Lemke, Johannes ;
Gril, Sabine ;
Pfeifer, Katharina .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2019, 175 (01) :217-228
[8]   Meeting the Decision-Making Preferences of Patients With Breast Cancer in Oncology Consultations: Impact on Decision-Related Outcomes [J].
Brown, Richard ;
Butow, Phyllis ;
Wilson-Genderson, Maureen ;
Bernhard, Juerg ;
Ribi, Karin ;
Juraskova, Ilona .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (08) :857-862
[9]  
Buchholz A, 2011, Zeitschrift fur Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, V4, P15
[10]   SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials [J].
Chan, An-Wen ;
Tetzlaff, Jennifer M. ;
Altman, Douglas G. ;
Laupacis, Andreas ;
Gotzsche, Peter C. ;
Krleza-Jeric, Karmela ;
Hrobjartsson, Asbjorn ;
Mann, Howard ;
Dickersin, Kay ;
Berlin, Jesse A. ;
Dore, Caroline J. ;
Parulekar, Wendy R. ;
Summerskill, William S. M. ;
Groves, Trish ;
Schulz, Kenneth F. ;
Sox, Harold C. ;
Rockhold, Frank W. ;
Rennie, Drummond ;
Moher, David .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2013, 158 (03) :200-+