Effect of the Emotional Freedom Techniques on anger symptoms in Hwabyung patients: A comparison with the progressive muscle relaxation technique in a pilot randomized controlled trial

被引:12
作者
Kwak, Hui-Yong [1 ]
Choi, Eun-Ji [2 ]
Kim, Jong-Woo [3 ,4 ]
Suh, Hyo-Weon [1 ]
Chung, Sun-Yong [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Kyung Hee Univ, Dept Neuropsychiat, Grad Sch, 1 Kyungheedae Ro, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Haneum Neuropsychiat Clin Korean Med, 1426 Jungang Ro, Goyang Si, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
[3] Kyung Hee Univ, Dept Neuropsychiat, Coll Korean Med, 1 Kyungheedae Ro, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Gangdong Kyung Hee Univ Hosp, Dept Korean Neuropsychiat, 892 Dongnam Ro, Seoul 05278, South Korea
关键词
Hwabyung; Anger; EFT; PMR; STAXI; EFT;
D O I
10.1016/j.explore.2019.08.006
中图分类号
R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
10 ;
摘要
Context: Hwabyung is a psychosomatic disease resulting from the suppression of anger over an extended period. The Emotional Freedom Techniques (EFT) are meridian-based psychotherapy known to cure many psychosomatic diseases, and progressive muscle relaxation (PMR) is a therapeutic method that relieves physical and psychological tension by repeated tensing and relaxation of the muscles. Object: In this study, we compared the effects of EFT and PMR in patients with Hwabyung. Design: 40 patients were enrolled and randomized to receive 4 weeks of group sessions with either EFT (n = 20) or PMR (n = 20). Evaluations were conducted pre- and post-treatment and at 4-week and 24-week follow-ups after session end. Main Outcome Measures: The Hwabyung Scale, Visual Analogue Scale of Hwabyung Symptoms (VAS -HS), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), and State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI) were administered as self-report tools. The analysis excluded 8 patients who never attended treatment and 1 patient meeting the exclusion criteria. Result: EFT (n =15) and PMR (n =16) improved Hwabyung symptoms (13.95% and 11.46%, respectively), state anxiety (-12.57% and -12.64%, respectively), and depression (-32.11% and -18.68%, respectively) (p < 0.05 for all). Trait anger improved in EFT group (-13.4%, p = 0.004). There were no significant differences between the groups (p > 0.05) except for trait anger at post-treatment (p = 0.022 for between group). No adverse events were reported during the study. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:170 / 177
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
American Psychiatric Association, 2000, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT
[2]  
[Anonymous], THESIS PONTIFICIA U
[3]  
[Anonymous], J ORIENT NEUROPSYCH
[4]  
[Anonymous], STRESS HLTH
[5]  
[Anonymous], KOREAN J MED ED
[6]  
[Anonymous], P KOR PSYCH ASS ANN
[7]  
[Anonymous], P 2 INT C BIOEL MELB
[8]  
[Anonymous], ENERGY PSYCHOL THEOR
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Kor J Psychopathol
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1970, The state-trait anxiety inventory test manual