Internal quality assurance systems in Portugal: what their strengths and weaknesses reveal

被引:13
作者
Tavares, Orlanda [1 ,2 ]
Sin, Cristina [1 ]
Amaral, Alberto [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] CIPES Ctr Res Higher Educ Policies, Matosinhos, Portugal
[2] A3ES Agcy Assessment & Accreditat Higher Educ, Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
internal quality assurance; certification; quality culture; strengths; weaknesses; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1080/02602938.2015.1064515
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
In Portugal, the agency for assessment and accreditation of higher education has recently included in its remit, beyond programme accreditation, the certification of internal quality assurance systems. This implies lighter touch accreditation and aims to direct institutions towards improvement, in addition to accountability. Twelve institutions have already undertaken the certification, and both self-assessment and external assessment reports are available. Based on the qualitative analysis of the nature of institutional strengths and weaknesses highlighted in these evaluation reports, the paper aims to understand whether the identified strengths and weaknesses are related to procedural and organisational matters or to cultural change (values and beliefs), in turn offering an insight into the quality culture(s) which characterise higher education institutions in Portugal. Findings suggest that the quality culture of the analysed institutions is somewhere between responsive and reactive. Overall, all reports dwell more on the prioritisation of formal and structural procedures, both regarding strengths and weaknesses. External reports point towards more weaknesses related to stakeholders' participation. Both aspects are more frequent in polytechnics than in universities. These findings suggest that polytechnics are more reactive, whereas universities are more responsive. Therefore, accountability apparently continues to be, for the time being, a more pressing concern than improvement.
引用
收藏
页码:1049 / 1064
页数:16
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Amaral A., 2008, Politicas de Ensino Superior: Quatro Temas em Debate pp, P17
[2]  
Amaral A, 2013, INT STUD HIGH EDUC, P141
[3]  
[Anonymous], ENQA REP STAND GUID
[4]  
Douglas M., 1982, In the active voice
[5]  
EUA, 2006, QUAL CULT EUR U BOTT
[6]  
Fonseca M, 2015, 2010 ACREDITACAO ANO
[7]   Quality Culture: understandings, boundaries and linkages [J].
Harvet, Lee ;
Stensaker, Bjorn .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, 2008, 43 (04) :427-442
[8]  
Harvey L., 2004, Quality in Higher Education, V10, P149, DOI [DOI 10.1080/1353832042000230635, 10.1080/1353832042000230635]
[9]  
Harvey L., 2007, Quality assurance in higher education: Trends in regulation, translation and transformation, P225
[10]   Fifteen Years of Quality in Higher Education (Part Two) [J].
Harvey, Lee ;
Williams, James .
QUALITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2010, 16 (02) :81-113