Tracking job and housing dynamics with smartcard data

被引:169
作者
Huang, Jie [1 ]
Levinson, David [2 ]
Wang, Jiaoe [1 ,3 ]
Zhou, Jiangping [4 ]
Wang, Zi-jia [5 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Key Lab Reg Sustainable Dev Modeling, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Sydney, Sch Civil Engn, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[3] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Coll Resources & Environm, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Hong Kong, Fac Architecture, Dept Urban Planning & Design, Hong Kong 999077, Peoples R China
[5] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
commuting pattern; job dynamics; housing dynamics; mobility group; smartcard data; HUMAN MOBILITY; INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION; RATIONAL LOCATOR; TRAVEL-TIMES;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.1815928115
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Residential locations, the jobs-housing relationship, and commuting patterns are key elements to understand urban spatial structure and how city dwellers live. Their successive interaction is important for various fields including urban planning, transport, intraurban migration studies, and social science. However, understanding of the long-term trajectories of workplace and home location, and the resulting commuting patterns, is still limited due to lack of year-to-year data tracking individual behavior. With a 7-y transit smartcard dataset, this paper traces individual trajectories of residences and workplaces. Based on in-metro travel times before and after job and/or home moves, we find that 45 min is an inflection point where the behavioral preference changes. Commuters whose travel time exceeds the point prefer to shorten commutes via moves, while others with shorter commutes tend to increase travel time for better jobs and/or residences. Moreover, we capture four mobility groups: home mover, job hopper, job-and-residence switcher, and stayer. This paper studies how these groups trade off travel time and housing expenditure with their job and housing patterns. Stayers with high job and housing stability tend to be home (apartment unit) owners subject to middle-to high-income groups. Home movers work at places similar to stayers, while they may upgrade from tenancy to ownership. Switchers increase commute time as well as housing expenditure via job and home moves, as they pay for better residences and work farther from home. Job hoppers mainly reside in the suburbs, suffer from long commutes, change jobs frequently, and are likely to be low-income migrants.
引用
收藏
页码:12710 / 12715
页数:6
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Quantifying Global International Migration Flows [J].
Abel, Guy J. ;
Sander, Nikola .
SCIENCE, 2014, 343 (6178) :1520-1522
[2]  
Alonso, 1964, LOCATION LAND USE GE
[3]  
Anas A, 1998, J ECON LIT, V36, P1426
[4]  
[Anonymous], 5 BEIJ COMPR TRANSP
[5]  
[Anonymous], EUROPEAN SOCIOLOGICA
[6]   Regression to the mean: what it is and how to deal with it [J].
Barnett, AG ;
van der Pols, JC ;
Dobson, AJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 34 (01) :215-220
[7]  
Batty Michael, 2013, Dialogues Hum Geogr, V3, P274, DOI 10.1177/2043820613513390
[8]   Predicting poverty and wealth from mobile phone metadata [J].
Blumenstock, Joshua ;
Cadamuro, Gabriel ;
On, Robert .
SCIENCE, 2015, 350 (6264) :1073-1076
[9]   JOBS-HOUSING BALANCING AND REGIONAL MOBILITY [J].
CERVERO, R .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION, 1989, 55 (02) :136-150
[10]   Sub-centring and commuting: Evidence from the San Francisco Bay Area, 1980-90 [J].
Cervero, R ;
Wu, KL .
URBAN STUDIES, 1998, 35 (07) :1059-1076