On Optimizing Distributed Tucker Decomposition for Sparse Tensors

被引:13
作者
Chakaravarthy, Venkatesan T. [1 ]
Choi, Jee W. [1 ]
Joseph, Douglas J. [1 ]
Murali, Prakash [1 ,2 ]
Pandian, Shivmaran S. [1 ]
Sabharwal, Yogish [1 ]
Sreedhar, Dheeraj [1 ]
机构
[1] IBM Res, Armonk, NY 10504 USA
[2] Princeton Univ, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUPERCOMPUTING (ICS 2018) | 2018年
关键词
Tensor decompositions; tensor distribution schemes;
D O I
10.1145/3205289.3205315
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
The Tucker decomposition generalizes the notion of Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) to tensors, the higher dimensional analogues of matrices. We study the problem of constructing the Tucker decomposition of sparse tensors on distributed memory systems via the HOOI procedure, a popular iterative method. The scheme used for distributing the input tensor among the processors (MPI ranks) critically influences the HOOI execution time. Prior work has proposed different distribution schemes: an offline scheme based on sophisticated hypergraph partitioning method and simple, lightweight alternatives that can be used real-time. While the hypergraph based scheme typically results in faster HOOI execution time, being complex, the time taken for determining the distribution is an order of magnitude higher than the execution time of a single HOOI iteration. Our main contribution is a lightweight distribution scheme, which achieves the best of both worlds. We show that the scheme is near-optimal on certain fundamental metrics associated with the HOOI procedure and as a result, near-optimal on the computational load (FLOPs). Though the scheme may incur higher communication volume, the computation time is the dominant factor and as the result, the scheme achieves better performance on the overall HOOI execution time. Our experimental evaluation on large real-life tensors (having up to 4 billion elements) shows that the scheme outperforms the prior schemes on the HOOI execution time by a factor of up to 3x. On the other hand, its distribution time is comparable to the prior lightweight schemes and is typically lesser than the execution time of a single HOOI iteration.
引用
收藏
页码:374 / 384
页数:11
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Approximation algorithms
[2]  
Austin W., 2016, IPDPS
[3]   Efficient MATLAB computations with sparse and factored tensors [J].
Bader, Brett W. ;
Kolda, Tamara G. .
SIAM JOURNAL ON SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING, 2007, 30 (01) :205-231
[4]  
Baskaran M., 2012, HPEC
[5]  
Boman E., 1999, ZOLTAN HOME PAGE
[6]   ANALYSIS OF INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCALING VIA AN N-WAY GENERALIZATION OF ECKART-YOUNG DECOMPOSITION [J].
CARROLL, JD ;
CHANG, JJ .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1970, 35 (03) :283-&
[7]  
Chakaravarthy V., 2017, IPDPS
[8]  
Choi J., 2014, ADV NEURAL INFORM PR
[9]   A multilinear singular value decomposition [J].
De Lathauwer, L ;
De Moor, B ;
Vandewalle, J .
SIAM JOURNAL ON MATRIX ANALYSIS AND APPLICATIONS, 2000, 21 (04) :1253-1278
[10]   On the best rank-1 and rank-(R1,R2,...,RN) approximation of higher-order tensors [J].
De Lathauwer, L ;
De Moor, B ;
Vandewalle, J .
SIAM JOURNAL ON MATRIX ANALYSIS AND APPLICATIONS, 2000, 21 (04) :1324-1342