Contracting water services with public and private partners: a case study approach

被引:21
作者
Pinto, Francisco Silva [1 ]
da Cruz, Nuno Ferreira [2 ]
Marques, Rui Cunha [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lisbon, Inst Super Tecn, Ctr Urban & Reg Studies CESUR, P-1699 Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Univ Lisbon, Inst Super Tecn, P-1699 Lisbon, Portugal
来源
JOURNAL OF WATER SUPPLY RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY-AQUA | 2015年 / 64卷 / 02期
关键词
contracting; public-private partnerships; public-public partnerships; risk management; water utilities; META-REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TRANSACTION COSTS; UTILITIES; PERFORMANCE; OWNERSHIP; BENCHMARKING; MANAGEMENT; GOVERNANCE; EFFICIENCY; PROVISION;
D O I
10.2166/aqua.2014.121
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The provision of water services is frequently a responsibility of local governments. Although municipalities remain accountable to the population for the availability, affordability, and quality of these services (facing the political repercussions of the perceived outcomes), the current operators may have different organizational models. Regardless of the utilities' governance model (direct or indirect delivery, public, private, or mixed ownership), it is a good practice to establish the rules, objectives, and administrative procedures between the competent authorities and the operators (or the partners) in a written agreement. In this paper we compare the contracts of two Portuguese utilities with different governance models: a public-private partnership and a public-public partnership. Since the best-practice guidelines are analogous, the (good) contracting practices should not differ significantly between the two arrangements. However, the results of the case-study analysis show that there are major differences in crucial details between the contracts employed, and that in many aspects the public interest is not safeguarded.
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 210
页数:17
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Productivity and efficiency in the water industry [J].
Abbott, Malcolm ;
Cohen, Bruce .
UTILITIES POLICY, 2009, 17 (3-4) :233-244
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, INFR 2030 MAPP POL E
[3]  
Argento D., 2010, INT J PUBLIC POLICY, V5, P41, DOI DOI 10.1504/IJPP.2010.029780
[4]   Auctions Versus Negotiations in Procurement: An Empirical Analysis [J].
Bajari, Patrick ;
McMillan, Robert ;
Tadelis, Steven .
JOURNAL OF LAW ECONOMICS & ORGANIZATION, 2009, 25 (02) :372-399
[5]   From public to private to ... mutual? - Restructuring water supply governance in England and Wales [J].
Bakker, KJ .
GEOFORUM, 2003, 34 (03) :359-374
[6]   Is Private Production of Public Services Cheaper Than Public Production? A Meta-Regression Analysis of Solid Waste and Water Services [J].
Bel, Germa ;
Fageda, Xavier ;
Warner, Mildred E. .
JOURNAL OF POLICY ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT, 2010, 29 (03) :553-577
[7]   Quantitative studies of water and sanitation utilities: a benchmarking literature survey [J].
Berg, Sanford V. ;
Marques, Rui Cunha .
WATER POLICY, 2011, 13 (05) :591-606
[8]   Private versus public provision of water services: does ownership matter for utility efficiency? [J].
Braadbaart, O .
JOURNAL OF WATER SUPPLY RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY-AQUA, 2002, 51 (07) :375-388
[9]   Transaction costs and institutional explanations for government service production decisions [J].
Brown, TL ;
Potoski, M .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2003, 13 (04) :441-468
[10]   A meta-regression analysis of benchmarking studies on water utilities market structure [J].
Carvaho, Pedro ;
Marques, Rui Cunha ;
Berg, Sanford .
UTILITIES POLICY, 2012, 21 :40-49