Measuring the value of central bank commitment in the benchmark New Keynesian model

被引:0
|
作者
Marest, Luc [1 ]
Thurston, Thom [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] CUNY, Queens Coll, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] CUNY, Grad Ctr, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
New Keynesian model; Optimal policy commitment; Welfare gains; STICKY-PRICE MODELS; MONETARY-POLICY; BUSINESS-CYCLE; RULES; LEVEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmacro.2018.06.005
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We measure the value of commitment in executing monetary policies in context of the benchmark New Keynesian model and where "value" is represented by the standard quadratic welfare function containing weighted output gap and inflation variances. The value of commitment is calculated as the difference in this welfare across commitment regimes of which there are at least six. Inspired by Bilbie (2014) we show how by means of selecting the optimal level of a single parameter in the setup of several so-called "discretionary" targeting regimes (price-targeting, speed-limit, etc.) one can produce optimal inertia identical to that of the Clarida, Gali, and Gertler (1999) "global commitment." Combining the targeting regimes with the commitment regime, we are left with three levels of commitment. Deriving welfare analytically as a function of all permissible parameters, rather the standard practice of calculating welfare based on a single or handful of parameter sets, we can measure the gain that would occur from jumping to higher commitment levels over all permissible sets. We also compare welfare surfaces with parameter combinations we have sampled. Result: depending on parameter selection the gains from optimal inertia may be high or low. Our sample of parameters actually used in the literature puts many near the high end, a few not. We find no parameter sets where a switch from no- to high-commitment would imply low or negligible gains. A side-effect of the analysis is that the optimal inertia regimes reduce nominal and real interest rate variance even when interest stability is not an objective of the central bank. We include Taylor-type rules that satisfy the requirements of each commitment level. Conceptually, the results indicate that at least in the benchmark NKM long-time questions such as whether price- or inflation-targeting is preferable are off point. The pertinent question is: in what commitment regime does the central bank find itself in?
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 265
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] FX Intervention in the New Keynesian Model
    Alla, Zineddine
    Espinoza, Raphael A.
    Ghosh, Atish R.
    JOURNAL OF MONEY CREDIT AND BANKING, 2020, 52 (07) : 1755 - 1791
  • [22] POLITICAL CONFLICT AND BARGAINING IN A NEW KEYNESIAN MODEL OF FISCAL STABILIZATION
    Flamini, Francesca
    Leith, Campbell
    MACROECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2021, 25 (08) : 2128 - 2179
  • [23] An Estimated DSGE Model Under the New Keynesian Framework for Mexico
    Fonseca-Zendejas, Alejandro Steven
    Borrego-Salcido, Carmen
    Venegas-Martinez, Francisco
    COMPUTATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2024,
  • [24] Optimal monetary policy in a New Keynesian model with heterogeneous expectations
    Di Bartolomeo, Giovanni
    Di Pietro, Marco
    Giannini, Bianca
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 2016, 73 : 373 - 387
  • [25] Central Bank Information Shocks, Value Gains, and Value Crashes
    Adra, Samer
    Menassa, Elie
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL FINANCE, 2024, 25 (01) : 15 - 29
  • [26] The end of Brazilian big inflation: lessons to monetary policy from a standard New Keynesian model
    Lopes, Luckas Sabioni
    Chauvet, Marcelle
    de Lima, Joao Eustaquio
    EMPIRICAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 55 (04) : 1475 - 1505
  • [27] Competitive moment matching of a New-Keynesian and an Old-Keynesian model
    Franke, Reiner
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC INTERACTION AND COORDINATION, 2018, 13 (02) : 201 - 239
  • [28] THE FOUR-EQUATION NEW KEYNESIAN MODEL
    Sims, Eric
    Wu, Jing Cynthia
    Zhang, Ji
    REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2023, 105 (04) : 931 - 947
  • [29] Learning, heterogeneity, and complexity in the New Keynesian model
    Jump, Robert Calvert
    Hommes, Cars
    Levine, Paul
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2019, 166 : 446 - 470
  • [30] Asset pricing implications of a New Keynesian model
    De Paoli, Bianca
    Scott, Alasdair
    Weeken, Olaf
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 2010, 34 (10) : 2056 - 2073