Anorectal functions after perineal and retropubic radical prostatectomy - a prospective clinical and anal manometric assessment

被引:4
作者
Aydemir, Huseyin [1 ]
Albayrak, Selami [1 ]
Canguven, Onder [1 ]
Horuz, Rahim [2 ]
Goktas, Cemal [1 ]
Cetinel, Cihangir [1 ]
Giral, Adnan [3 ]
机构
[1] Kartal Egitim & Arastirma Hastanesi, Kartal Training & Res Hosp, TR-34865 Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Osmaniye State Hosp, Osmaniye, Turkey
[3] Marmara Univ, Sch Med, Dept Gastroenterol, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
anal incontinence; perineum; prostate; prostatic neoplasms; FECAL INCONTINENCE;
D O I
10.5114/aoms.2011.20619
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: The aim of this study is to evaluate the anorectal functions of prostate cancer patients who have undergone radical perinea! prostatectomy (RPP) or radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) surgery. Material and methods: Thirty-seven patients with an indication for radical prostatectomy were included after informed consent. Anorectal manometry was performed before and one month after the surgery in 22 RPP and 15 RRP patients in our clinic. Clinical assessment was evaluated by anorectal functions with anal incontinence scoring (AIS) (Fernandez; no incontinence = 0; maximal incontinence = 12). Patients with a history of anorectal surgery were excluded from the study. The following data were recorded: external anal sphincteric pressure (EASP), internal anal sphincteric pressure (IASP), minimum ano-rectal reflex volume (MARRV) and minimum rectal sensory volume (MRSV). Results: In the RPP and RRP groups, the mean age was 66 (56-75) and 64.3 (52-73) years, respectively. In the RPP group, EASP and IASP values showed a significant decrease after the surgery. In the RRP group, EASP and IASP were also decreased after the surgery, but without statistical significance. No significant change was seen in MARRV and MRSV of either group. When the scores of AIS were analysed, no significant clinical difference between pre- or post-operative scores was seen in RPP and RRP groups. Conclusions: Perineal or retropubic surgery may injure pelvic floor muscles and/or supplying nerves, which likely causes anorectal dysfunction. Although there is a significant decrease in early postoperative EASP and IASP after RPP, it has no clinical significance according to AIS.
引用
收藏
页码:138 / 142
页数:5
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   Incidence of fecal and urinary incontinence following radical perineal and retropubic prostatectomy in a national population [J].
Bishoff, JT ;
Motley, G ;
Optenberg, SA ;
Stein, CR ;
Moon, KA ;
Browning, SM ;
Sabanegh, E ;
Foley, JP ;
Thompson, IM .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 160 (02) :454-458
[2]   A longitudinal assessment of bowel related symptoms and fecal incontinence following radical perineal prostatectomy [J].
Dahm, P ;
Silverstein, AD ;
Weizer, AZ ;
Young, MD ;
Vieweg, J ;
Albala, DM ;
Paulson, DF .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (06) :2220-2224
[3]   Significance of pelvic floor muscles in anal incontinence [J].
Fernández-Fraga, X ;
Azpiroz, F ;
Malagelada, JR .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2002, 123 (05) :1441-1450
[4]   Fecal incontinence after radical perineal prostatectomy: A prospective study [J].
Kirschner-Hermanns, R ;
Borchers, H ;
Reineke, T ;
Willis, S ;
Jakse, G .
UROLOGY, 2005, 65 (02) :337-342
[5]   Preservation of fecal continence and bowel function after radical perineal and retropubic prostatectomy: A questionnaire-based outcomes study [J].
Korman, HJ ;
Mulholland, TL ;
Huang, R .
PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2004, 7 (03) :249-252
[6]   Recovery of health related quality of life in the year after radical prostatectomy: Early experience [J].
Litwin, MS ;
McGuigan, KA ;
Shpall, AI ;
Dhanani, N .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 161 (02) :515-519
[7]  
MARCIO J, 1993, DIS COLON RECTUM, V36, P77
[8]   COMMUNITY-BASED PREVALENCE OF ANAL INCONTINENCE [J].
NELSON, R ;
NORTON, N ;
CAUTLEY, E ;
FURNER, S .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 274 (07) :559-561
[9]   Outpatient radical prostatectomy: Impact of standard perineal approach on patient outcome [J].
Ruiz-Deya, G ;
Davis, R ;
Srivastav, SK ;
Wise, AM ;
Thomas, R .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (02) :581-586
[10]   Nuclear Grading Versus Gleason Grading in Small Samples Containing Prostate Cancer: A Tissue Microarray Study [J].
Wittschieber, Daniel ;
Koellermann, Jens ;
Schlomm, Thorsten ;
Sauter, Guido ;
Erbersdobler, Andreas .
PATHOLOGY & ONCOLOGY RESEARCH, 2010, 16 (04) :479-484