Application of bibliometrics in medicine: a historical bibliometrics analysis

被引:307
作者
Kokol, Peter [1 ]
Blazun Vosner, Helena [2 ,3 ]
Zavrsnik, Jernej [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maribor, Fac Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Koroska Cesta 46, SLO-2000 Maribor, Slovenia
[2] Community Healthcare Ctr Dr Adolf Drolc, Maribor, Slovenia
[3] Fac Hlth & Social Sci Slovenj Gradec, Slovenj Gradec, Slovenia
关键词
bibliometrics; citation analysis; evidence-based medicine (EBM); research; biomedical; 100; CITATION-CLASSICS; GOOGLE-SCHOLAR; IMPACT FACTOR; SCIENCE; JOURNALS; SCOPUS; WEB; OPPORTUNITIES; PUBLICATIONS; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1111/hir.12295
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Background The application of bibliometrics in medicine enables one to analyse vast amounts of publications and their production patterns on macroscopic and microscopic levels. Objectives The aim of the study was to analyse the historical perspective of research literature production regarding application of bibliometrics in medicine. Methods Publications related to application of bibliometrics in medicine from 1970 to 2018 were harvested from the Scopus bibliographic database. Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy was triangulated with the VOSViewer to identify historical roots and evolution of topics and clinical areas. Results The search resulted in 6557 publications. The literature production trend was positive. Historical roots analysis identified 33 historical roots and 16 clinical areas where bibliometrics was applied. Discussion The increase in productivity in application of bibliometrics in medicine might be attributed to increased use of quantitative metrics in research evaluation, publish or perish phenomenon and the increased use of evidence-based medicine. Conclusion The trend of the literature production was positive. Medicine was in the forefront of knowledge development in bibliometrics. reference publication year spectroscopy proved to be an accurate method which was able to identify most of the historical roots.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 138
页数:14
相关论文
共 95 条
[41]   BIBLIOGRAPHIC COUPLING BETWEEN SCIENTIFIC PAPERS [J].
KESSLER, MM .
AMERICAN DOCUMENTATION, 1963, 14 (01) :10-&
[42]  
Kojima Asumi, 2017, Jpn J Clin Pharmacol Ther, V48, P41
[43]  
Kokol P., 2018, J. Hosp. Librariansh, V18, P315, DOI [DOI 10.1080/15323269.2018.1509193, 10.1080/15323269.2018.1509193]
[44]   Discrepancies among Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed coverage of funding information in medical journal articles [J].
Kokol, Peter ;
Vosner, Helena Blazun .
JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, 2018, 106 (01) :81-86
[45]  
Kokol Peter, 2018, Informatologia, V51, P142
[46]   Data literacy for researchers and data librarians [J].
Koltay, Tibor .
JOURNAL OF LIBRARIANSHIP AND INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2017, 49 (01) :3-14
[47]   CAB: Citation-assisted background [J].
Kostoff, RN ;
Shlesinger, MF .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2005, 62 (02) :199-212
[48]   Comparisons of Citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for Articles Published in General Medical Journals [J].
Kulkarni, Abhaya V. ;
Aziz, Brittany ;
Shams, Iffat ;
Busse, Jason W. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2009, 302 (10) :1092-1096
[49]   Bibliometric analysis of gaps in research on asbestos-related diseases: declining emphasis on public health over 26 years [J].
Lin, Ro-Ting ;
Soeberg, Matthew John ;
Chien, Lung-Chang ;
Fisher, Scott ;
Takala, Jukka ;
Lemen, Richard ;
Driscoll, Tim ;
Takahashi, Ken .
BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (07)
[50]  
Lotka AJ., 1926, J WASHINGTON ACAD SC, V16, P317, DOI DOI 10.1002/ASI.4630280610