Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: Systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:100
作者
Tagliafico, Alberto Stefano [1 ]
Bignotti, Bianca [2 ]
Rossi, Federica [3 ]
Signori, Alessio [4 ]
Sormani, Maria Pia [4 ]
Valdora, Francesca [1 ]
Calabrese, Massimo [5 ]
Houssami, Nehmat [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Genoa, Dept Expt Med, Inst Anat, Via LB Alberti, I-16132 Genoa, Italy
[2] Univ Genoa, Dept Hlth Sci, Dept Radiol, Via Pastore, I-16132 Genoa, Italy
[3] Univ Genoa, Sch Med, Via Pastore, I-16132 Genoa, Italy
[4] Univ Genoa, Dept Hlth Sci, Inst Stat, Via Pastore, I-16132 Genoa, Italy
[5] IRCCS Azienda Osped Univ San Martino IST, Dept Radiol, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, I-16138 Genoa, Italy
[6] Univ Sydney, Sydney Med Sch, Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
Accuracy; Sensitivity; Specificity; Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography; Systematic review; Meta-analysis; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; ACCURACY; INTERVAL; DENSITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.breast.2016.04.008
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To estimate sensitivity and specificity of CESM for breast cancer diagnosis. Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis of the accuracy of CESM in finding breast cancer in highly selected women. We estimated summary receiver operating characteristic curves, sensitivity and specificity according to quality criteria with QUADAS-2. Results: Six hundred four studies were retrieved, 8 of these reporting on 920 patients with 994 lesions, were eligible for inclusion. Estimated sensitivity from all studies was: 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96-1.00). Specificity was estimated from six studies reporting raw data: 0.58 (95% CI: 0.38-0.77). The majority of studies were scored as at high risk of bias due to the very selected populations. Conclusion: CESM has a high sensitivity but very low specificity. The source studies were based on highly selected case series and prone to selection bias. High-quality studies are required to assess the accuracy of CESM in unselected cases. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 19
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography in routine clinical practice in 2013 [J].
Badr, S. ;
Laurent, N. ;
Regis, C. ;
Boulanger, L. ;
Lemaille, S. ;
Poncelet, E. .
DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2014, 95 (03) :245-258
[2]   INTERVAL BREAST CANCERS IN THE SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY PROGRAM OF BRITISH-COLUMBIA - ANALYSIS AND CLASSIFICATION [J].
BURHENNE, HJ ;
BURHENNE, LW ;
GOLDBERG, F ;
HISLOP, TG ;
WORTH, AJ ;
REBBECK, PM ;
KAN, L .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1994, 162 (05) :1067-1071
[3]  
BURHENNE HJ, 1994, AM J ROENTGENOL, V162, P1074
[4]   Clinical utility of dual-energy contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for breast microcalcifications without associated mass: a preliminary analysis [J].
Cheung, Yun-Chung ;
Tsai, Hsiu-Pei ;
Lo, Yung-Feng ;
Ueng, Shir-Hwa ;
Huang, Pei-Chin ;
Chen, Shin-Chih .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2016, 26 (04) :1082-1089
[5]   Dual-energy contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) [J].
Daniaux, Martin ;
De Zordo, Tobias ;
Santner, Wolfram ;
Amort, Birgit ;
Koppelstaetter, Florian ;
Jaschke, Werner ;
Dromain, Clarisse ;
Oberaigner, Willi ;
Hubalek, Michael ;
Marth, Christian .
ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2015, 292 (04) :739-747
[6]   Systematic reviews in health care - Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening [J].
Deeks, JJ .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 323 (7305) :157-162
[7]   METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
DERSIMONIAN, R ;
LAIRD, N .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03) :177-188
[8]   Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: Does mammography provide additional clinical benefits or can some radiation exposure be avoided? [J].
Fallenberg, Eva Maria ;
Dromain, Clarisse ;
Diekmann, Felix ;
Renz, Diane M. ;
Amer, Heba ;
Ingold-Heppner, Barbara ;
Neumann, Avidan U. ;
Winzer, Klaus J. ;
Bick, Ulrich ;
Hamm, Bernd ;
Engelken, Florian .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2014, 146 (02) :371-381
[9]   TRANSFORMATIONS RELATED TO THE ANGULAR AND THE SQUARE ROOT [J].
FREEMAN, MF ;
TUKEY, JW .
ANNALS OF MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS, 1950, 21 (04) :607-611
[10]   metandi: Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy using hierarchical logistic regression [J].
Harbord, Roger M. ;
Whiting, Penny .
STATA JOURNAL, 2009, 9 (02) :211-229