Spatially explicit models for decision-making in animal conservation and restoration

被引:41
|
作者
Zurell, Damaris [1 ]
Konig, Christian [1 ]
Malchow, Anne-Kathleen [1 ]
Kapitza, Simon [1 ,2 ]
Bocedi, Greta [3 ]
Travis, Justin [3 ]
Fandos, Guillermo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Potsdam, Inst Biochem & Biol, Potsdam, Germany
[2] Univ Melbourne, Sch BioSci, Quantitat & Appl Ecol Grp, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Aberdeen, Sch Biol Sci, Zoology Bldg,Tillydrone Ave, Aberdeen, Scotland
关键词
adaptive management; biodiversity conservation; cost optimisation; ecosystem restoration; global change; predictive models; CLIMATE-CHANGE; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; PROTECTED AREAS; COMPLEX; OPTIMIZATION; EXTINCTION; SIMULATION; POPULATION; STRATEGIES; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1111/ecog.05787
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Models are useful tools for understanding and predicting ecological patterns and processes. Under ongoing climate and biodiversity change, they can greatly facilitate decision-making in conservation and restoration and help designing adequate management strategies for an uncertain future. Here, we review the use of spatially explicit models for decision support and to identify key gaps in current modelling in conservation and restoration. Of 650 reviewed publications, 217 publications had a clear management application and were included in our quantitative analyses. Overall, modelling studies were biased towards static models (79%), towards the species and population level (80%) and towards conservation (rather than restoration) applications (71%). Correlative niche models were the most widely used model type. Dynamic models as well as the gene-to-individual level and the community-to-ecosystem level were underrepresented, and explicit cost optimisation approaches were only used in 10% of the studies. We present a new model typology for selecting models for animal conservation and restoration, characterising model types according to organisational levels, biological processes of interest and desired management applications. This typology will help to more closely link models to management goals. Additionally, future efforts need to overcome important challenges related to data integration, model integration and decision-making. We conclude with five key recommendations, suggesting that wider usage of spatially explicit models for decision support can be achieved by 1) developing a toolbox with multiple, easier-to-use methods, 2) improving calibration and validation of dynamic modelling approaches and 3) developing best-practise guidelines for applying these models. Further, more robust decision-making can be achieved by 4) combining multiple modelling approaches to assess uncertainty, and 5) placing models at the core of adaptive management. These efforts must be accompanied by long-term funding for modelling and monitoring, and improved communication between research and practise to ensure optimal conservation and restoration outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Practical solutions for making models indispensable in conservation decision-making
    Addison, Prue F. E.
    Rumpff, Libby
    Bau, S. Sana
    Carey, Janet M.
    Chee, Yung En
    Jarrad, Frith C.
    McBride, Marissa F.
    Burgman, Mark A.
    DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2013, 19 (5-6) : 490 - 502
  • [2] Spatially explicit experiments for the exploration of land-use decision-making dynamics
    Evans, Tom P.
    Sun, Wenjie
    Kelley, Hugh
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2006, 20 (09) : 1013 - 1037
  • [3] Decision-making in animal models of opiate and stimulant addiction
    Ahmed, S. H.
    EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2008, 18 : S194 - S194
  • [4] Habitat restoration in spatially explicit metacommunity models
    Gawecka, Klementyna A.
    Bascompte, Jordi
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 2021, 90 (05) : 1239 - 1251
  • [5] Uncertainty in spatially explicit animal dispersal models
    Mooij, WM
    DeAngelis, DL
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2003, 13 (03) : 794 - 805
  • [6] Dialogue in conservation decision-making
    Henderson, Jane
    Nakamoto, Tanya
    STUDIES IN CONSERVATION, 2016, 61 : 67 - 78
  • [7] CONSERVATION DECISION-MAKING - RATIONALIZATION
    BEAZLEY, R
    NATURAL RESOURCES JOURNAL, 1967, 7 (03) : 345 - 360
  • [8] Animal affect and decision-making
    Mendl, Michael
    Paul, Elizabeth S.
    NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2020, 112 : 144 - 163
  • [9] MODELS OF DECISION-MAKING
    KAPLAN, MF
    SCHWARTZ, S
    CONTEMPORARY PSYCHOLOGY, 1977, 22 (04): : 342 - 342
  • [10] Models in animal collective decision-making: information uncertainty and conflicting preferences
    Conradt, Larissa
    INTERFACE FOCUS, 2012, 2 (02) : 226 - 240