How can we improve guideline use? A conceptual framework of implementability

被引:297
作者
Gagliardi, Anna R. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Brouwers, Melissa C. [4 ]
Palda, Valerie A. [5 ]
Lemieux-Charles, Louise [2 ,3 ]
Grimshaw, Jeremy M. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Surg, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Inst Med Sci, Fac Med, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
[4] McMaster Univ, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Dept Oncol, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, Dept Med, Guidelines Advisory Comm, Ctr Effect Practice, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Ottawa, Dept Med, Ctr Best Practices, Inst Populat Hlth, Ottawa, ON, Canada
来源
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE | 2011年 / 6卷
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINES; BREAST-CANCER GUIDELINES; SHARED DECISION-MAKING; KNOWLEDGE TRANSLATION; QUALITY; RECOMMENDATIONS; ORGANIZATIONS; DISSEMINATION; PERFORMANCE; ATTRIBUTES;
D O I
10.1186/1748-5908-6-26
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Guidelines continue to be underutilized, and a variety of strategies to improve their use have been suboptimal. Modifying guideline features represents an alternative, but untested way to promote their use. The purpose of this study was to identify and define features that facilitate guideline use, and examine whether and how they are included in current guidelines. Methods: A guideline implementability framework was developed by reviewing the implementation science literature. We then examined whether guidelines included these, or additional implementability elements. Data were extracted from publicly available high quality guidelines reflecting primary and institutional care, reviewed independently by two individuals, who through discussion resolved conflicts, then by the research team. Results: The final implementability framework included 22 elements organized in the domains of adaptability, usability, validity, applicability, communicability, accommodation, implementation, and evaluation. Data were extracted from 20 guidelines on the management of diabetes, hypertension, leg ulcer, and heart failure. Most contained a large volume of graded, narrative evidence, and tables featuring complementary clinical information. Few contained additional features that could improve guideline use. These included alternate versions for different users and purposes, summaries of evidence and recommendations, information to facilitate interaction with and involvement of patients, details of resource implications, and instructions on how to locally promote and monitor guideline use. There were no consistent trends by guideline topic. Conclusions: Numerous opportunities were identified by which guidelines could be modified to support various types of decision making by different users. New governance structures may be required to accommodate development of guidelines with these features. Further research is needed to validate the proposed framework of guideline implementability, develop methods for preparing this information, and evaluate how inclusion of this information influences guideline use.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [11] Gaps between knowing and doing: Understanding and assessing the barriers to optimal health care
    Cochrane, Lorna J.
    Olson, Curtis A.
    Murray, Suzanne
    Dupuis, Martin
    Tooman, Tricia
    Hayes, Sean
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2007, 27 (02) : 94 - 102
  • [12] Naturalistic decision making: A model to overcome methodological challenges in the study of critical care nurses' decision making about patients' hemodynamic status
    Currey, J
    Botti, M
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2003, 12 (03) : 206 - 211
  • [13] Impact of formal continuing medical education - Do conferences, workshops, rounds, and other traditional continuing education activities change physician behavior or health care outcomes?
    Davis, D
    O'Brien, MAT
    Freemantle, N
    Wolf, FM
    Mazmanian, P
    Taylor-Vaisey, A
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (09): : 867 - 874
  • [14] Explaining diffusion patterns for complex health care innovations
    Denis, JL
    Hébert, Y
    Langley, A
    Lozeau, D
    Trottier, LH
    [J]. HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2002, 27 (03) : 60 - 73
  • [15] Local opinion leaders: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes
    Doumit, G.
    Gattellari, M.
    Grimshaw, J.
    O'Brien, M. A.
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2007, (01):
  • [16] The qualitative content analysis process
    Elo, Satu
    Kyngaes, Helvi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2008, 62 (01) : 107 - 115
  • [17] FitzGerald J Mark, 2006, Can Respir J, V13, P253
  • [18] Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes
    Forsetlund, Louise
    Bjorndal, Arild
    Rashidian, Arash
    Jamtvedt, Gro
    O'Brien, Mary Ann
    Wolf, Fredric
    Davis, Dave
    Odgaard-Jensen, Jan
    Oxman, Andrew D.
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2009, (02):
  • [19] Attributes of clinical recommendations that influence change in practice following audit and feedback
    Foy, R
    MacLennan, G
    Grimshaw, J
    Penney, G
    Campbell, M
    Grol, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 55 (07) : 717 - 722
  • [20] Factors influencing the implementation of clinical guidelines for health care professionals: A systematic meta-review
    Francke, Anneke L.
    Smit, Marieke C.
    de Veer, Anke J. E.
    Mistiaen, Patriek
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2008, 8 (1)