How can we improve guideline use? A conceptual framework of implementability

被引:297
作者
Gagliardi, Anna R. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Brouwers, Melissa C. [4 ]
Palda, Valerie A. [5 ]
Lemieux-Charles, Louise [2 ,3 ]
Grimshaw, Jeremy M. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Surg, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Inst Med Sci, Fac Med, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
[4] McMaster Univ, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Dept Oncol, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, Dept Med, Guidelines Advisory Comm, Ctr Effect Practice, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Ottawa, Dept Med, Ctr Best Practices, Inst Populat Hlth, Ottawa, ON, Canada
来源
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE | 2011年 / 6卷
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINES; BREAST-CANCER GUIDELINES; SHARED DECISION-MAKING; KNOWLEDGE TRANSLATION; QUALITY; RECOMMENDATIONS; ORGANIZATIONS; DISSEMINATION; PERFORMANCE; ATTRIBUTES;
D O I
10.1186/1748-5908-6-26
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Guidelines continue to be underutilized, and a variety of strategies to improve their use have been suboptimal. Modifying guideline features represents an alternative, but untested way to promote their use. The purpose of this study was to identify and define features that facilitate guideline use, and examine whether and how they are included in current guidelines. Methods: A guideline implementability framework was developed by reviewing the implementation science literature. We then examined whether guidelines included these, or additional implementability elements. Data were extracted from publicly available high quality guidelines reflecting primary and institutional care, reviewed independently by two individuals, who through discussion resolved conflicts, then by the research team. Results: The final implementability framework included 22 elements organized in the domains of adaptability, usability, validity, applicability, communicability, accommodation, implementation, and evaluation. Data were extracted from 20 guidelines on the management of diabetes, hypertension, leg ulcer, and heart failure. Most contained a large volume of graded, narrative evidence, and tables featuring complementary clinical information. Few contained additional features that could improve guideline use. These included alternate versions for different users and purposes, summaries of evidence and recommendations, information to facilitate interaction with and involvement of patients, details of resource implications, and instructions on how to locally promote and monitor guideline use. There were no consistent trends by guideline topic. Conclusions: Numerous opportunities were identified by which guidelines could be modified to support various types of decision making by different users. New governance structures may be required to accommodate development of guidelines with these features. Further research is needed to validate the proposed framework of guideline implementability, develop methods for preparing this information, and evaluate how inclusion of this information influences guideline use.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [1] THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR
    AJZEN, I
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) : 179 - 211
  • [2] The nature of evidence resources and knowledge translation for health promotion practitioners
    Armstrong, Rebecca
    Waters, Elizabeth
    Crockett, Belinda
    Keleher, Helen
    [J]. HEALTH PROMOTION INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 22 (03) : 254 - 260
  • [3] THE PRACTICE GUIDELINES DEVELOPMENT CYCLE - A CONCEPTUAL TOOL FOR PRACTICE GUIDELINES DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION
    BROWMAN, GP
    LEVINE, MN
    MOHIDE, EA
    HAYWARD, RSA
    PRITCHARD, KI
    GAFNI, A
    LAUPACIS, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1995, 13 (02) : 502 - 512
  • [4] Evidence of suboptimal management of cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and symptomatic atherosclerosis
    Brown, LC
    Johnson, JA
    Majumdar, SR
    Tsuyuki, RT
    McAlister, FA
    [J]. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2004, 171 (10) : 1189 - 1192
  • [5] Bucknall T, 2007, NURS RES, V56, pS60
  • [6] Towards evidence-based clinical practice:: an international survey of 18 clinical guideline programs
    Burgers, JS
    Grol, R
    Klazinga, NS
    Mäkelä, M
    Zaat, J
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2003, 15 (01) : 31 - 45
  • [7] The cycle of change: implementing best-evidence clinical practice
    Carey, Mariko
    Buchan, Heather
    Sanson-Fisher, Rob
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2009, 21 (01) : 37 - 43
  • [8] Thou shalt versus thou shalt not: a meta-synthesis of GPs' attitudes to clinical practice guidelines
    Carlsen, Benedicte
    Glenton, Claire
    Pope, Catherine
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2007, 57 (545) : 971 - 978
  • [9] CARTER AO, 1995, CAN MED ASSOC J, V153, P901
  • [10] Cluzeau F, 2003, QUAL SAF HEALTH CARE, V12, P18