A systematic review exploring the content and outcomes of interventions to improve psychological safety, speaking up and voice behaviour

被引:92
作者
O'Donovan, Roisin [1 ]
McAuliffe, Eilish [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll Dublin, UCD Hlth Sci Ctr, UCD Sch Nursing Midwifery & Hlth Syst, Dublin 4, Ireland
关键词
Psychological safety; Speaking up; Voice behaviour; Teams; Interventions; HEALTH-CARE; OPERATING-ROOM; EDUCATION; IMPLEMENTATION; PERFORMANCE; TEAMWORK; SKILLS;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-020-4931-2
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundHaving psychologically safe teams can improve learning, creativity and performance within organisations. Within a healthcare context, psychological safety supports patient safety by enabling engagement in quality improvement and encouraging staff to speak up about errors. Despite the low levels of psychological safety in healthcare teams and the important role it plays in supporting patient safety, there is a dearth of research on interventions that can be used to improve psychological safety or its related constructs. This review synthesises the content, theoretical underpinnings and outcomes of interventions which have targeted psychological safety, speaking up, and voice behaviour within a healthcare setting. It aims to identify successful interventions and inform the development of more effective interventions.MethodsA key word search strategy was developed and used to search electronic databases (PsycINFO, ABI/Inform, Academic search complete and PubMed) and grey literature databases (OpenGrey, OCLC WorldCat, Espace). Covidence, an online specialised systematic review website, was used to screen records. Data extraction, quality appraisal and narrative synthesis were conducted on identified papers.ResultsFourteen interventions were reviewed. These interventions fell into five categories. Educational interventions used simulation, video presentations, case studies and workshops while interventions which did not include an educational component used holistic facilitation, forum play and action research meetings. Mixed results were found for the efficacy or effectiveness of these interventions. While some interventions showed improvement in outcomes related to psychological safety, speaking up and voice, this was not consistently demonstrated across interventions. Included interventions' ability to demonstrate improvements in these outcomes were limited by a lack of objective outcome measures and the ability of educational interventions alone to change deeply rooted speaking up behaviours.ConclusionTo improve our understanding of the efficacy or effectiveness of interventions targeting psychological safety, speaking up and voice behaviour, longitudinal and multifaceted interventions are needed. In order to understand whether these interventions are successful, more objective measures should be developed. It is recommended that future research involves end users in the design phase of interventions, target both group and organisational levels, ensure visible leader support and work across and within interdisciplinary teams.Prospero registration numberCRD42018100659.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]  
Hoffmann TC, 2014, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V348, DOI [10.1136/bmj.g1687, 10.1055/s-0041-111066]
[22]  
Hovancsek M., 2007, Using simulation in nursing education. Simulation in nursing education: From Conceptualization to Evaluation, P1
[23]   Simulation technology for health care professional skills training and assessment [J].
Issenberg, SB ;
McGaghie, WC ;
Hart, IR ;
Mayer, JW ;
Felner, JM ;
Petrusa, ER ;
Waugh, RA ;
Brown, DD ;
Safford, RR ;
Gessner, IH ;
Gordon, DL ;
Ewy, GA .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (09) :861-866
[24]  
Johnson Hope L, 2012, AORN J, V95, P591, DOI 10.1016/j.aorn.2012.03.002
[25]  
Khan K., 2011, Systematic reviews to support evidence based medicine
[26]   Silenced by fear: The nature, sources, and consequences of fear at work [J].
Kish-Gephart, Jennifer J. ;
Detert, James R. ;
Trevino, Linda Klebe ;
Edmondson, Amy C. .
RESEARCH IN ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, VOL 29: AN ANNUAL SERIES OF ANALYTICAL ESSAYS AND CRITICAL REVIEWS, 2009, 29 :163-193
[27]   Behavioral Integrity for Safety, Priority of Safety, Psychological Safety, and Patient Safety: A Team-Level Study [J].
Leroy, Hannes ;
Dierynck, Bart ;
Anseel, Frederik ;
Simons, Tony ;
Halbesleben, Jonathon R. B. ;
McCaughey, Deirdre ;
Savage, Grant T. ;
Sels, Luc .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 97 (06) :1273-1281
[28]  
Liberati A, 2009, ANN INTERN MED, V151, pW65, DOI [10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100, 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00136]
[29]  
Moher D, 2015, SYST REV-LONDON, V4, DOI [10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097, 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1, 10.1136/bmj.i4086, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007, 10.1136/bmj.b2700, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.07.299, 10.1136/bmj.b2535]
[30]  
Moore L., 2010, CLIN GOVERNANCE, V15, P166, DOI 10.1108/14777271011063805