Pyrenophora teres: profile of an increasingly damaging barley pathogen

被引:142
作者
Liu, Zhaohui [1 ]
Ellwood, Simon R. [2 ]
Oliver, Richard P. [3 ]
Friesen, Timothy L. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] N Dakota State Univ, Dept Plant Pathol, Fargo, ND 58105 USA
[2] Murdoch Univ, Div Hlth Sci, Australian Ctr Necrotroph Fungal Pathogens, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
[3] Curtin Univ Technol, Dept Environm & Agr, Perth, WA 6845, Australia
[4] ARS, USDA, Cereal Crops Res Unit, No Crop Sci Lab, Fargo, ND 58105 USA
关键词
NET BLOTCH RESISTANCE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; ADULT-PLANT RESISTANCE; DOUBLED-HAPLOID POPULATION; HOST-SELECTIVE TOXINS; F-TERES; DRECHSLERA-TERES; SPOT-TYPE; CAUSAL AGENT; DISEASE RESISTANCE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1364-3703.2010.00649.x
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Pyrenophora teres, causal agent of net blotch of barley, exists in two forms, designated P. teres f. teres and P. teres f. maculata, which induce net form net blotch (NFNB) and spot form net blotch (SFNB), respectively. Significantly more work has been performed on the net form than on the spot form although recent activity in spot form research has increased because of epidemics of SFNB in barley-producing regions. Genetic studies have demonstrated that NFNB resistance in barley is present in both dominant and recessive forms, and that resistance/susceptibility to both forms can be conferred by major genes, although minor quantitative trait loci have also been identified. Early work on the virulence of the pathogen showed toxin effector production to be important in disease induction by both forms of pathogen. Since then, several laboratories have investigated effectors of virulence and avirulence, and both forms are complex in their interaction with the host. Here, we assemble recent information from the literature that describes both forms of this important pathogen and includes reports describing the host-pathogen interaction with barley. We also include preliminary findings from a genome sequence survey. . ..
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 19
页数:19
相关论文
共 141 条
  • [1] Role of reactive oxygen species in the response of barley to necrotrophic pathogens
    Able, AJ
    [J]. PROTOPLASMA, 2003, 221 (1-2) : 137 - 143
  • [2] A region of barley chromosome 6H harbors multiple major genes associated with net type net blotch resistance
    Abu Qamar, M.
    Liu, Z. H.
    Faris, J. D.
    Chao, S.
    Edwards, M. C.
    Lai, Z.
    Franckowiak, J. D.
    Friesen, T. L.
    [J]. THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 2008, 117 (08) : 1261 - 1270
  • [3] Development of an international standard set of barley differential genotypes for Pyrenophora teres f. teres
    Afanasenko, O. S.
    Jalli, M.
    Pinnschmidt, H. O.
    Filatova, O.
    Platz, G. J.
    [J]. PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2009, 58 (04) : 665 - 676
  • [4] Genetics of host-pathogen interactions in the Pyrenophora teres f. teres (net form) -: barley (Hordeum vulgare) pathosystem
    Afanasenko, Olga
    Mironenko, Nina
    Filatova, Olga
    Kopahnke, Doris
    Kramer, Ilona
    Ordon, Frank
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2007, 117 (03) : 267 - 280
  • [5] THE TAXONOMY OF HELMINTHOSPORIUM SPECIES
    ALCORN, JL
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1988, 26 : 37 - 56
  • [6] INHERITANCE OF PARTIAL RESISTANCE TO NET BLOTCH IN BARLEY
    ARABI, MI
    SARRAFI, A
    BARRAULT, G
    ALBERTINI, L
    [J]. PLANT BREEDING, 1990, 105 (02) : 150 - 155
  • [7] Pathogenic variation among isolates of Pyrenophora teres, the causal agent of barley net blotch
    Arabi, MIE
    Al-Safadi, B
    Charbaji, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYTOPATHOLOGY-PHYTOPATHOLOGISCHE ZEITSCHRIFT, 2003, 151 (7-8): : 376 - 382
  • [8] Electrophoretic karyotypes of the phytopathogenic Pyrenophora graminea and P-teres
    Aragona, M
    Montigiani, M
    Porta-Puglia, A
    [J]. MYCOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2000, 104 : 853 - 857
  • [9] Atanasoff D, 1919, J AGRIC RES, V18, P0379
  • [10] STRUCTURES, PROPERTIES AND RELATIONSHIP TO THE ASPERGILLOMARASMINES OF TOXINS PRODUCED BY PYRENOPHORA-TERES
    BACH, E
    CHRISTENSEN, S
    DALGAARD, L
    LARSEN, PO
    OLSEN, CE
    [J]. PHYSIOLOGICAL PLANT PATHOLOGY, 1979, 14 (01): : 41 - 46