Estimating effective contact and flight times using a sacral-mounted inertial measurement unit

被引:3
作者
Patoz, Aurelien [1 ,2 ]
Lussiana, Thibault [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Breine, Bastiaan [2 ,5 ]
Gindre, Cyrille [2 ,3 ]
Malatesta, Davide [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lausanne, Inst Sport Sci, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
[2] Dept Res & Dev, Volodalen Swiss Sport Lab, CH-1860 Aigle, Switzerland
[3] Dept Res & Dev, F-39270 Chaveria, France
[4] Univ Franche Comte, Res Unit EA3920 Prognost Markers, Regulatory Factors Cardiovasc Dis & Exercise Perf, Besancon, France
[5] Univ Ghent, Dept Movement & Sports Sci, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
关键词
Gait analysis; Running; Biomechanics; Sensor; Accelerometer; FOOT STRIKE PATTERN; TAKE-OFF ASYMMETRY; GAIT; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110667
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
Effective ground contact (tce) and flight (tfe) times were proven to be more appropriate to decipher the landingtake-off asymmetry of running than usual ground contact (tc) and flight (tf) times. To measure these effective timings, force plate is the gold standard method (GSM), though not very portable overground. In such situation, alternatives could be to use portable tools such as inertial measurement unit (IMU). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to propose a method that uses the vertical acceleration recorded using a sacral-mounted IMU to estimate tce and tfe and to compare these estimations to those from GSM. Besides, tce and tfe were used to evaluate the landing-take-off asymmetry, which was further compared to GSM. One hundred runners ran at 9, 11, and 13 km/h. Force data (200 Hz) and IMU data (208 Hz) were acquired by an instrumented treadmill and a sacralmounted IMU, respectively. The comparison between GSM and IMU method depicted root mean square error <22 ms (<14%) for tce and tfe along with small systematic biases (<20 ms) for each tested speed. These errors are similar to previously published methods that estimated usual tc and tf. The systematic biases on tce and tfe were subtracted before calculating the landing-take-off asymmetry, which permitted to correctly evaluate it at a group level. Therefore, the findings of this study support the use of this method based on vertical acceleration recorded using a sacral-mounted IMU to estimate tce and tfe for level treadmill runs and to evaluate the landing-take-off asymmetry but only after subtraction of systematic biases and at a group level.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Stride adjustments during a running approach toward a force plate
    AbendrothSmith, J
    [J]. RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT, 1996, 67 (01) : 97 - 101
  • [2] Sacral acceleration can predict whole-body kinetics and stride kinematics across running speeds
    Alcantara, Ryan S.
    Day, Evan M.
    Hahn, Michael E.
    Grabowski, Alena M.
    [J]. PEERJ, 2021, 9
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
  • [4] Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine
    Atkinson, G
    Nevill, AM
    [J]. SPORTS MEDICINE, 1998, 26 (04) : 217 - 238
  • [5] Bailey Joshua, 2017, Int J Exerc Sci, V10, P1067
  • [6] COMPARING METHODS OF MEASUREMENT - WHY PLOTTING DIFFERENCE AGAINST STANDARD METHOD IS MISLEADING
    BLAND, JM
    ALTMAN, DG
    [J]. LANCET, 1995, 346 (8982): : 1085 - 1087
  • [7] Initial foot contact and related kinematics affect impact loading rate in running
    Breine, Bastiaan
    Malcolm, Philippe
    Van Caekenberghe, Ine
    Fiers, Pieter
    Frederick, Edward C.
    De Clercq, Dirk
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, 2017, 35 (15) : 1556 - 1564
  • [8] The landing-take-off asymmetry of human running is enhanced in old age
    Cavagna, G. A.
    Legramandi, M. A.
    Peyre-Tartaruga, L. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2008, 211 (10) : 1571 - 1578
  • [9] The landing-take-off asymmetry in human running
    Cavagna, G. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2006, 209 (20) : 4051 - 4060
  • [10] Cavagna G.A., P BIOL SCI, V275, P411