An explainable machine learning model for predicting in-hospital amputation rate of patients with diabetic foot ulcer

被引:46
作者
Xie, Puguang [1 ,2 ]
Li, Yuyao [1 ,2 ]
Deng, Bo [1 ]
Du, Chenzhen [1 ,2 ]
Rui, Shunli [1 ]
Deng, Wu [3 ]
Wang, Min [1 ,2 ]
Boey, Johnson [4 ]
Armstrong, David G. [5 ]
Ma, Yu [1 ,2 ]
Deng, Wuquan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Univ, Cent Hosp, Chongqing Emergency Med Ctr, Dept Endocrinol & Metab,Chongqing Key Lab Emergen, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Univ China, Coll Bioengn, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[3] Civil Aviat Univ China, Coll Elect Informat & Automat, Tianjin, Peoples R China
[4] Natl Univ Singapore Hosp, Dept Podiatry, Singapore, Singapore
[5] Univ Southern Calif, Dept Surg, Keck Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
amputation; diabetic foot; forecasting; machine learning; precision medicine; RISK; CLASSIFICATION; SURGERY; MANAGEMENT; ISCHEMIA; SOCIETY; WAGNER;
D O I
10.1111/iwj.13691
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is one of the most serious and alarming diabetic complications, which often leads to high amputation rates in diabetic patients. Machine learning is a part of the field of artificial intelligence, which can automatically learn models from data and better inform clinical decision-making. We aimed to develop an accurate and explainable prediction model to estimate the risk of in-hospital amputation in patients with DFU. A total of 618 hospitalised patients with DFU were included in this study. The patients were divided into non-amputation, minor amputation or major amputation group. Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) and 5-fold cross-validation tools were used to construct a multi-class classification model to predict the three outcomes of interest. In addition, we used the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) algorithm to interpret the predictions of the model. Our area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC) demonstrated a 0.90, 0.85 and 0.86 predictive ability for non-amputation, minor amputation and major amputation outcomes, respectively. Taken together, our data demonstrated that the developed explainable machine learning model provided accurate estimates of the amputation rate in patients with DFU during hospitalisation. Besides, the model could inform individualised analyses of the patients' risk factors.
引用
收藏
页码:910 / 918
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Predicting 10-Year Risk of End-Organ Complications of Type 2 Diabetes With and Without Metabolic Surgery: A Machine Learning Approach [J].
Aminian, Ali ;
Zajichek, Alexander ;
Arterburn, David E. ;
Wolski, Kathy E. ;
Brethauer, Stacy A. ;
Schauer, Philip R. ;
Nissen, Steven E. ;
Kattan, Michael W. .
DIABETES CARE, 2020, 43 (04) :852-859
[2]  
Armstrong David G, 2007, Int Wound J, V4, P286
[3]   Telehealth-guided home-basedmaggot debridement therapy for chronic complex wounds: Peri- andpost-pandemicpotential [J].
Armstrong, David G. ;
Rowe, Vincent L. ;
D'Huyvetter, Karen ;
Sherman, Ronald A. .
INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL, 2020, 17 (05) :1490-1495
[4]   Change in amputation predictors in diabetic foot disease: effect of multidisciplinary approach [J].
Aydin, Kadriye ;
Isildak, Mehlika ;
Karakaya, Jale ;
Gurlek, Alper .
ENDOCRINE, 2010, 38 (01) :87-92
[5]   Comparing alternative models: log vs Cox proportional hazard? [J].
Basu, A ;
Manning, WG ;
Mullahy, J .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2004, 13 (08) :749-765
[6]   A new wound-based severity score for diabetic foot ulcers -: A prospective analysis of 1,000 patients [J].
Beckert, S ;
Witte, M ;
Wicke, C ;
Königsrainer, A ;
Coerper, S .
DIABETES CARE, 2006, 29 (05) :988-992
[7]  
Bergstra J., 2011, P 25 INT C NEUR INF, DOI DOI 10.5555/2986459.2986743
[8]   Prediction of diabetic foot ulcer occurrence using commonly available clinical information - The Seattle diabetic foot study [J].
Boyko, EJ ;
Ahroni, JH ;
Cohen, V ;
Nelson, KM ;
Heagerty, PJ .
DIABETES CARE, 2006, 29 (06) :1202-1207
[9]  
Caravaggi C, 2013, J CARDIOVASC SURG, V54, P737
[10]   XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System [J].
Chen, Tianqi ;
Guestrin, Carlos .
KDD'16: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, 2016, :785-794