Task predictability influences the variable foreperiod effect: evidence of task-specific temporal preparation

被引:16
作者
Schroeter, Hannes [1 ]
Birngruber, Teresa [1 ]
Bratzke, Daniel [1 ]
Miller, Jeff [2 ]
Ulrich, Rolf [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tubingen, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
[2] Univ Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
来源
PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG | 2015年 / 79卷 / 02期
关键词
SIMPLE REACTION-TIME; NONSPECIFIC PREPARATION; ATTENTION; UNCERTAINTY; READINESS; DURATION; STIMULI; COSTS;
D O I
10.1007/s00426-014-0550-z
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Temporal preparation usually results in enhanced performance in choice reaction time tasks. The present study investigated to what extent temporal preparation involves increased readiness for task-specific processing requirements as opposed to increased task-independent readiness. Participants performed either a pitch, a letter, or a color discrimination task within a variable foreperiod paradigm and tasks alternated regularly between auditory and visual discriminations. In separate blocks of trials, the upcoming visual discrimination task was either predictable or unpredictable. We observed the standard variable foreperiod effect for both visual discrimination tasks irrespective of task predictability. Importantly, however, the variable foreperiod effect was larger when the visual discrimination task was predictable than when it was unpredictable. These results suggest that temporal preparation in choice reaction time tasks involves increased readiness for both task-independent and task-specific processing requirements.
引用
收藏
页码:230 / 237
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
[21]   Locus of the effect of temporal preparation:: Evidence from the lateralized readiness potential [J].
Müller-Gethmann, H ;
Ulrich, R ;
Rinkenauer, G .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 40 (04) :597-611
[22]  
Naatanen R, 1970, Acta Psychol (Amst), V34, P399, DOI 10.1016/0001-6918(70)90035-1
[23]   TIMING OF EXPECTANCY PEAK IN SIMPLE REACTION-TIME SITUATION [J].
NAATANEN, R ;
MURANEN, V ;
MERISALO, A .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1974, 38 (06) :461-470
[24]   FOREPERIOD AND VISUAL STIMULUS-INTENSITY - A REAPPRAISAL [J].
NIEMI, P ;
LEHTONEN, E .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1982, 50 (01) :73-82
[25]   FOREPERIOD AND SIMPLE REACTION-TIME [J].
NIEMI, P ;
NAATANEN, R .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1981, 89 (01) :133-162
[26]   COSTS OF A PREDICTABLE SWITCH BETWEEN SIMPLE COGNITIVE TASKS [J].
ROGERS, RD ;
MONSELL, S .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1995, 124 (02) :207-231
[27]   Spatial representation of pitch height:: the SMARC effect [J].
Rusconi, E ;
Kwan, B ;
Giordano, BL ;
Umiltà, C ;
Butterworth, B .
COGNITION, 2006, 99 (02) :113-129
[28]  
SIMON JR, 1975, J MOTOR BEHAV, V7, P9, DOI 10.1080/00222895.1975.10735008
[29]   Sequential effects within a short foreperiod context: Evidence for the conditioning account of temporal preparation [J].
Steinborn, Michael B. ;
Rolke, Bettina ;
Bratzke, Daniel ;
Ulrich, Rolf .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2008, 129 (02) :297-307
[30]   Dynamic adjustment of temporal preparation: Shifting warning signal modality attenuates the sequential foreperiod effect [J].
Steinborn, Michael B. ;
Rolke, Bettina ;
Bratzke, Daniel ;
Ulrich, Rolf .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2009, 132 (01) :40-47