Capacity planning for mega container terminals with multi-objective and multi-fidelity simulation optimization

被引:35
作者
Li, Haobin [1 ]
Zhou, Chenhao [2 ]
Lee, Byung Kwon [2 ]
Lee, LooHay [2 ]
Chew, Ek Peng [2 ]
Goh, Rick Siow Mong [1 ]
机构
[1] ASTAR, Inst High Performance Comp, Dept Comp Sci, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
Capacity planning; container terminals; resource configuration; simulation-based optimization; multi-objective multi-fidelity optimization; PERFORMANCE; OPERATIONS; ALLOCATION; ALGORITHM; SYSTEMS; DESIGN; NUMBER;
D O I
10.1080/24725854.2017.1318229
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Container terminals play a significant role as representative logistics facilities for contemporary trades by handling outbound, inbound, and transshipment containers to and from the sea (shipping liners) and the hinterland (consignees). Capacity planning is a fundamental decision process when constructing, expanding, or renovating a container terminal to meet demand, and the outcome of this planning is typically represented in terms of configurations of resources (e.g., the numbers of quay cranes, yard cranes, and vehicles), which enables the container flows to satisfy a high service level for vessels (e.g., berth-on-arrivals). This study presents a decision-making process that optimizes the capacity planning of large-scale container terminals. Advanced simulation-based optimization algorithms, such as Multi-Objective Multi-Fidelity Optimization with Ordinal Transformation and Optimal Sampling (MO-(MOTOS)-T-2), Multi-Objective Optimal Computing Budget Allocation (MOCBA), and Multi-Objective Convergent Optimization via Most-Promising-Area Stochastic Search (MO-COMPASS), were employed to formulate and optimally solve the large-scale multi-objective problem with multi-fidelity simulation models. Various simulation results are compared with one another in terms of the capacities over different resource configurations to understand the effect of various parameter settings on optimal capacity across the algorithms.
引用
收藏
页码:849 / 862
页数:14
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Modeling and Feedback Control for Resource Allocation and Performance Analysis in Container Terminals [J].
Alessandri, Angelo ;
Cervellera, Cristiano ;
Cuneo, Marta ;
Gaggero, Mauro ;
Soncin, Giuseppe .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2008, 9 (04) :601-614
[2]   Simulation-Optimization Models for the Dynamic Berth Allocation Problem [J].
Arango, Carlos ;
Cortes, Pablo ;
Onieva, Luis ;
Escudero, Alejandro .
COMPUTER-AIDED CIVIL AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2013, 28 (10) :769-779
[3]  
Chen C.-H, 2011, Stochastic Simulation Optimization: An Optimal Computing Budget Allocation, V1
[4]   Simulation-based optimization for housekeeping in a container transshipment terminal [J].
Cordeau, Jean-Francois ;
Legato, Pasquale ;
Mazza, Rina Mary ;
Trunfio, Roberto .
COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2015, 53 :81-95
[5]   THE VARIANCE OF THE NUMBER OF CUSTOMERS IN ARE INFINITE-SERVER QUEUING SYSTEM WITH AN ARBITRARILY CORRELATED ARRIVAL PROCESS [J].
DAGANZO, CF ;
DIEZROUX, E .
QUEUEING SYSTEMS, 1995, 19 (03) :289-299
[6]   THE PRODUCTIVITY OF MULTIPURPOSE SEAPORT TERMINALS [J].
DAGANZO, CF .
TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE, 1990, 24 (03) :205-216
[7]   A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II [J].
Deb, K ;
Pratap, A ;
Agarwal, S ;
Meyarivan, T .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2002, 6 (02) :182-197
[9]   A simulation optimization method for internal trucks sharing assignment among multiple container terminals [J].
He, Junliang ;
Zhang, Weimin ;
Huang, Youfang ;
Yan, Wei .
ADVANCED ENGINEERING INFORMATICS, 2013, 27 (04) :598-614
[10]   Hybrid design methodology and cost-effectiveness evaluation of AGV transportation systems [J].
Hoshino, Satoshi ;
Ota, Jun ;
Shinozaki, Akiko ;
Hashimoto, Hideki .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATION SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2007, 4 (03) :360-372