Randomized, controlled trial of breath therapy for patients with chronic low-back pain

被引:107
作者
Mehling, WE [1 ]
Hamel, KA
Acree, M
Byl, N
Hecht, FM
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Osher Ctr Integrat Med, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Family & Community Med, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Motion Lab, Dept Phys Therapy & Rehabil Sci, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-263X.2005.00605.x
中图分类号
R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
10 ;
摘要
Context (.) Patients suffering from chronic low back pain (cLBP) are often unsatisfied with conventional medical care and seek alternative therapies. Many mind-body techniques are said to help patients with low back pain by enhancing body awareness, which includes proprioception deficit in cLBP, but have not been rigorously studied in cLBP. Breath therapy is a western mind-body therapy integrating body awareness, breathing, meditation, and movement. Preliminary data suggest benefits from breath therapy for proprioception and low back pain. Objective (.) To assess the effect of breath therapy on cLBP. Design - Randomized, controlled trial. Setting - Academic medical center. Participants(.) Thirty-six patients with cLBP. Interventions (.) Six to eight weeks (12 sessions) of breath therapy versus physical therapy. Main Outcome Measures - Pain by visual analog scale (VAS), function by Roland Scale, overall health by Short Form 36 (SF-36) at baseline, six to eight weeks, and six months. Balance as a potential surrogate for proprioception and body-awareness measured at the beginning and end of treatment. Results (.) Pre- to post-intervention, patients in both groups improved in pain (VAS: -2.7 with breath therapy, -2.4 with physical therapy; SF-36: +14.9 with breath therapy and +21.0 with physical therapy). Breath therapy recipients improved in function (Roland: -4.8) and in the physical and emotional role (SF-36: +15.5 and 14.3). Physical therapy recipients improved in vitality (SF-36: +15.0). Average improvements were not different between groups. At six to eight weeks, results showed a trend favoring breath therapy; at six-months, a trend favoring physical therapy. Balance measures showed no improvements and no correlations with other outcomes. Conclusions (.) Patients suffering from cLBP improved significantly with breath therapy. Changes in standard low back pain measures of pain and disability were comparable to those resulting from high-quality, extended physical therapy. Breath therapy was safe. Qualitative data suggested improved coping skills and new insight into the effect of stress on the body as a result of breath therapy. Balance measures did not seem to be valid measures of clinical change in patients' cLBP.
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 52
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
ANDERSSON GBJ, 1991, OCCUPATIONAL LOW BAC, P95
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1993, BODY LIFE CREATING N
[3]   Mind-body medicine: State of the science, implications for practice [J].
Astin, JA ;
Shapiro, SL ;
Eisenberg, DM ;
Forys, KL .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY PRACTICE, 2003, 16 (02) :131-147
[4]   Changes of body equilibrium reactions through breath work. A posturographic study with visual feedback. [J].
Aust, G ;
Fischer, K .
LARYNGO-RHINO-OTOLOGIE, 1997, 76 (10) :577-582
[5]   Implementing a research agenda for complementary and alternative medicine [J].
Berman, JD ;
Straus, SE .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF MEDICINE, 2004, 55 :239-254
[6]  
Borkan Jeffrey, 2002, Spine (Phila Pa 1976), V27, pE128, DOI 10.1097/00007632-200203010-00019
[7]  
BROOKS C, 1983, SENSORY AWARENESS RE
[8]   The role of paraspinal muscle spindles in lumbosacral position sense in individuals with and without low back pain [J].
Brumagne, S ;
Cordo, P ;
Lysens, R ;
Verschueren, S ;
Swinnen, S .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (08) :989-994
[9]   VARIATIONS IN BALANCE AND BODY SWAY IN MIDDLE-AGED ADULTS - SUBJECTS WITH HEALTHY BACKS COMPARED WITH SUBJECTS WITH LOW-BACK DYSFUNCTION [J].
BYL, NN ;
SINNOTT, PL .
SPINE, 1991, 16 (03) :325-330
[10]   Interoception: The inside story - A model for psychosomatic processes [J].
Cameron, OG .
PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE, 2001, 63 (05) :697-710