The infusion method trial of void vs standard catheter removal in the outpatient setting: a prospective randomized trial

被引:15
|
作者
Boccola, Mark A. [1 ]
Sharma, Anant [1 ]
Taylor, Claire [1 ]
Wong, Lih-Ming [1 ]
Travis, Douglas [1 ]
Chan, Steven [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Dept Surg, Western Hosp, Footscray, Vic 3011, Australia
关键词
trial of void (TOV); acute urinary retention (AUR); outpatient setting; urinary catheter; discharge time; ACUTE URINARY RETENTION; INTRAVESICAL PROSTATIC PROTRUSION; TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION; FOLLOW-UP; PROSTATECTOMY; MANAGEMENT; ALFUZOSIN; PLACEBO; IMPACT; MEN;
D O I
10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10044.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE center dot To ascertain if filling the bladder with warm normal saline before trial of void (TOV) reduces time to decision of outcome of TOV and time to discharge compared with standard in-dwelling catheter (IDC) removal in the outpatient setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS center dot A prospective randomized controlled trial (not blinded) was carried out in the day procedure unit. Randomization was done using computer-generated random numbers. The sample size was calculated based on initial pilot data using alpha = 0.05 and beta = 0.2 and a clinically important reduction of >= 60 min for time to decision of outcome of TOV (primary outcome measure). center dot In all, 60 consecutive patients were recruited from two referral sources: presentations of acute urinary retention to the emergency department and patients discharged home after failing TOV postoperatively. center dot The infusion method group (32 patients) had 300-500 mL warm normal saline infused into the bladder before removing their IDC and the control group (28) had standard IDC removal. center dot Data were collected and analysed using the two-tailed Mann-Whitney U-test. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS center dot The median time to decision was 135.0 (95% confidence interval CI 95.0-190.0) min in the infusion group and 247.5 (95% CI 189.6-294.1) min in the control group. center dot Patients undergoing a bladder infusion had a shorter discharge time [180.0 (95% CI 126.0-226.9) min] than patients in the standard-IDC-removal group [262.5 (95% CI 233.8-315.0) min]. center dot The infusion arm shortened time to decision by 112.5 min (P < 0.001) and time to discharge by 82.5 min (P < 0.001). center dot Furthermore, patients in the infusion group were 1.56 times more likely to achieve catheter-free state after TOV (risk ratio 1.56, 95% CI 1.03-2.36; P = 0.03). CONCLUSION center dot The infusion method for TOV is safe and expeditious, making it ideal for the outpatient setting. This randomized study shows that the infusion method enables a rapid determination of outcome of TOV with a greater chance of success and shortened discharge times.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 46
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bladder infusion versus standard catheter removal for trial of void: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Makary, Joshua
    Phan, Kevin
    McClintock, George
    Doctor, Marinelle
    Habashy, David
    Heywood, Sean
    McCombie, Steve P.
    Arianayagam, Mohan
    Canagasingham, Bertram
    Ferguson, Richard
    Goolam, Ahmed
    Khadra, Mohamed
    Ko, Raymond
    Varol, Celi
    Winter, Matthew
    Roberts, Matthew J.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 39 (06) : 1781 - 1788
  • [2] Bladder infusion versus standard catheter removal for trial of void: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Joshua Makary
    Kevin Phan
    George McClintock
    Marinelle Doctor
    David Habashy
    Sean Heywood
    Steve P. McCombie
    Mohan Arianayagam
    Bertram Canagasingham
    Richard Ferguson
    Ahmed Goolam
    Mohamed Khadra
    Raymond Ko
    Celi Varol
    Matthew Winter
    Matthew J. Roberts
    World Journal of Urology, 2021, 39 : 1781 - 1788
  • [3] Clinical benefits of retrograde bladder filling method prior to catheter removal after TURP for BPH: A prospective randomized trial
    Song, Sang Hun
    Kim, Jin Hyuck
    Kim, Jung Kwon
    Oh, Jong Jin
    Lee, Sangchul
    Jeong, Seong Jin
    Byun, Seok-Soo
    Hong, Sung Kyu
    Lee, Hakmin
    INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2022, 63 (06) : 656 - 662
  • [4] Prospective, multicentre, randomized controlled trial of bladder filling prior to trial of void on the timing of discharge
    Du, Jason
    Marshall, Daniel
    Leyland, John
    Shaw, Leanne
    Broome, Kim E.
    Mason, David F. C.
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 83 (04) : 239 - 242
  • [5] The feasibility and advantages of immediate removal of urinary catheter after lobectomy: A prospective randomized trial
    Zhang, Lei
    Yang, Xueying
    Tian, Ye
    Yu, Qian
    Xu, Yang
    Zhou, Di
    Wu, Zhuo
    Zhao, Xitong
    NURSING OPEN, 2021, 8 (06): : 2942 - 2948
  • [6] Antibiotic prophylaxis at the time of catheter removal after radical prostatectomy: A prospective randomized clinical trial
    Berrondo, Claudia
    Feng, Changyong
    Kukreja, Janet B.
    Messing, Edward M.
    Joseph, Jean V.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2019, 37 (03) : 181.e7 - 181.e14
  • [7] Prospective randomized controlled trial evaluating cap-assisted colonoscopy vs standard colonoscopy
    Tee, Hoi-Poh
    Corte, Crispin
    Al-Ghamdi, Hamdan
    Prakoso, Emilia
    Darke, John
    Chettiar, Raman
    Rahman, Wassim
    Davison, Scott
    Griffin, Sean P.
    Selby, Warwick S.
    Kaffes, Arthur J.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 16 (31) : 3905 - 3910
  • [8] A single-center, prospective, randomized clinical trial to investigate the optimal removal time of the urinary catheter after laparoscopic anterior resection of the rectum: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Lai Xu
    Zhi-Yan Tao
    Jun-Yang Lu
    Guan-Nan Zhang
    Hui-Zhong Qiu
    Bin Wu
    Guo-Le Lin
    Tao Xu
    Yi Xiao
    Trials, 20
  • [9] A single-center, prospective, randomized clinical trial to investigate the optimal removal time of the urinary catheter after laparoscopic anterior resection of the rectum: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Xu, Lai
    Tao, Zhi-Yan
    Lu, Jun-Yang
    Zhang, Guan-Nan
    Qiu, Hui-Zhong
    Wu, Bin
    Lin, Guo-Le
    Xu, Tao
    Xiao, Yi
    TRIALS, 2019, 20 (1)
  • [10] Saline bladder infusion vs standard catheter removal in patients with acute urinary retention related to benign prostatic hyperplasia: The BLAPERF Study
    Corral, R.
    Boissier, R.
    Depaquit, T. L.
    Gondran-Tellier, B.
    Bastide, C.
    Lechevallier, E.
    Baboudjian, M.
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2023, 33 (06): : 319 - 324