Analysis of Industry 4.0 challenges using best worst method: A case study

被引:72
作者
Wankhede, Vishal Ashok [1 ]
Vinodh, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Technol, Dept Prod Engn, Tiruchirappalli 620015, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
Industry; 4; 0; Challenges; Multi criteria decision making; Best worst method; Automotive sector; Manufacturing; TECHNOLOGIES; FUTURE; SUSTAINABILITY; NETWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.cie.2021.107487
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
As manufacturing organizations are in need to adopt Industry 4.0 technologies, analysis of challenges is essential. Industry 4.0 is relatively new to the developing nations particularly India and requires in-depth knowledge about its implementation challenges and business practices. Industry 4.0 adoption can aid manufacturing industries to digitalize the manufacturing process which in turn helps in increasing the production output. However, adoption of Industry 4.0 is not so easy due to presence of various challenges. This study aims to identify key challenges pertaining to Industry 4.0 adoption in automotive sector and analyse the identified challenges to derive rank for systematic implementation in Indian automotive industries. In this regard, thirty-six challenges are identified related to Industry 4.0 adoption and categorized into four dimensions and are analysed using Indian automotive component manufacturing firms based on Best Worst Method (BWM). The priority order of challenges is derived, and the prioritized challenges are found to be 'Real-time link of physical production and digital factory (MT1)' and 'Context-adaptive and autonomous systems (MT2)'. The challenges are being analysed with regard to Indian automotive component firms in manufacturing domain. Practical and managerial along with theoretical and academic implications are highlighted. Moreover, the conclusions, limitations and future research directions are presented.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Organizational and managerial challenges in the path toward Industry 4.0 [J].
Agostini, Lara ;
Filippini, Roberto .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2019, 22 (03) :406-421
[2]   Application of total interpretive structural modelling (TISM) for analysis of factors influencing sustainable additive manufacturing: a case study [J].
Agrawal, Rohit ;
Vinodh, S. .
RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL, 2019, 25 (07) :1198-1223
[3]   Determining and evaluating socially sustainable supply chain criteria in agri-sector of developing countries: insights from West Africa cashew industry [J].
Agyemang, Martin ;
Kusi-Sarpong, Simonov ;
Agyemang, John ;
Jia, Fu ;
Adzanyo, Mary .
PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2022, 33 (11) :1115-1133
[4]   Assessing the social sustainability of supply chains using Best Worst Method [J].
Ahmadi, Hadi Badri ;
Kusi-Sarpong, Simonov ;
Rezaei, Jafar .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2017, 126 :99-106
[5]   Social sustainable supplier evaluation and selection: a group decision-support approach [J].
Bai, Chunguang ;
Kusi-Sarpong, Simonov ;
Ahmadi, Hadi Badri ;
Sarkis, Joseph .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2019, 57 (22) :7046-7067
[6]  
Chou S.Y., 2017, INT J BUSINESS COMMU, P1
[7]   A survey of industrial augmented reality [J].
de Souza Cardoso, Luis Fernando ;
Queiroz Mariano, Flavia Cristina Martins ;
Zorzal, Ezequiel Roberto .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 139
[8]  
Dregger J, 2016, 2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ETHICS IN ENGINEERING, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (ETHICS)
[9]   Simulation in industry 4.0: A state-of-the-art review [J].
Ferreira, William de Paula ;
Armellini, Fabiano ;
De Santa-Eulalia, Luis Antonio .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 149
[10]   Industry 4.0 technologies: Implementation patterns in manufacturing companies [J].
Frank, Alejandro German ;
Dalenogare, Lucas Santos ;
Ayala, Nestor Fabian .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2019, 210 :15-26