On Active Disturbance Rejection Control in Presence of Measurement Noise

被引:59
作者
Ahmad, Saif [1 ]
Ali, Ahmad [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol Patna, Dept Elect Engn, Bihta 801103, Bihar, India
关键词
Observers; Bandwidth; Noise measurement; Noise reduction; Estimation error; Gain measurement; Sensitivity; Active disturbance rejection control (ADRC); dc-dc converter; noise suppression; voltage control; HIGH-GAIN OBSERVERS;
D O I
10.1109/TIE.2021.3121754
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
High-gain nature of extended state observer (ESO), which forms an integral part of active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) technique, results in the following limitations: 1) Sensitivity to high-frequency measurement noise which limits closed-loop performance in practical applications. 2) Escalation of observer gains up to a power n + 1 of observer bandwidth, which complicates numerical implementation when system order (n) or observer bandwidth is large. To overcome these limitations, a low-power higher order ESO is proposed in the present work for practical application of ADRC scheme in noisy environment. Moreover, a recently proposed cascade ESO (CESO), designed for noise suppression, is analyzed in the frequency-domain to reveal an underlying similarity with higher-order ESO, which is not reported in literature. Presented analysis justifies the performance improvement obtained over conventional ESO and provides a guideline for selecting the number of cascade levels based on the expected nature of disturbance. Case study performed on a dc-dc boost converter illustrates the practical advantages of proposed scheme over CESO in terms of improved immunity to high-frequency measurement noise, precise regulation in presence of time-varying disturbance, low observer gains that facilitate numerical implementation, and ease of tuning due to a single observer parameter.
引用
收藏
页码:11600 / 11610
页数:11
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Unified Disturbance-Estimation-Based Control and Equivalence With IMC and PID: Case Study on a DC-DC Boost Converter [J].
Ahmad, Saif ;
Ali, Ahmad .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, 2021, 68 (06) :5122-5132
[2]   Active disturbance rejection control of DC-DC boost converter: a review with modifications for improved performance [J].
Ahmad, Saif ;
Ali, Ahmad .
IET POWER ELECTRONICS, 2019, 12 (08) :2095-2107
[3]   High-gain observers in the presence of measurement noise: A switched-gain approach [J].
Ahrens, Jeffrey H. ;
Khalil, Hassan K. .
AUTOMATICA, 2009, 45 (04) :936-943
[4]   On the use of low-pass filters in high-gain observers [J].
Astolfi, Daniele ;
Zaccarian, Luca ;
Jungers, Marc .
SYSTEMS & CONTROL LETTERS, 2021, 148
[5]   Low-power peaking-free high-gain observers [J].
Astolfi, Daniele ;
Marconi, Lorenzo ;
Praly, Laurent ;
Teel, Andrew R. .
AUTOMATICA, 2018, 98 :169-179
[6]   A High-Gain Nonlinear Observer With Limited Gain Power [J].
Astolfi, Daniele ;
Marconi, Lorenzo .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2015, 60 (11) :3059-3064
[7]   Bank of High-Gain Observers in Output Feedback Control: Robustness Analysis Against Measurement Noise [J].
Esfandiari, Kasra ;
Shakarami, Mehran .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN CYBERNETICS-SYSTEMS, 2021, 51 (04) :2476-2487
[8]  
Gao ZQ, 2003, P AMER CONTR CONF, P4989
[9]   Performance Analysis of Generalized Extended State Observer in Tackling Sinusoidal Disturbances [J].
Godbole, Ashwini A. ;
Kolhe, Jaywant P. ;
Talole, Sanjay E. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 21 (06) :2212-2223
[10]   From PID to Active Disturbance Rejection Control [J].
Han, Jingqing .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, 2009, 56 (03) :900-906