Dose and volume parameters for MRI-based treatment planning in intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer

被引:271
作者
Kirisits, C [1 ]
Pötter, R [1 ]
Lang, S [1 ]
Dimopoulos, J [1 ]
Wachter-Gerstner, N [1 ]
Georg, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Radiotherapy & Radiobiol, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2005年 / 62卷 / 03期
关键词
brachytherapy; cervical cancer; treatment planning; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.02.040
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based treatment planning in intracavitary brachytherapy allows optimization of the dose distribution on a patient-by-patient basis. In addition to traditionally used point dose and volume parameters, dose-volume histogram (DVH) analysis enables further possibilities for prescribing and reporting. This study reports the systematic development of our concept applied in clinical routine. Methods and Materials: A group of 22 patients treated with 93 fractions using a tandem-ring applicator and MRI-based individual treatment planning for each application was analyzed in detail. High-risk clinical target volumes and gross tumor volumes were contoured. The dose to bladder, rectum, and sigma was analyzed according to International Commission of Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) Report 38 and DVH parameters (e.g., D-2cc represents the minimal dose for the most irradiated 2 cm(3)). Total doses, including external beam radiotherapy and the values for each individual brachytherapy fraction, were biologically normalized to conventional 2-Gy fractions (alpha/beta 10 Gy for target, 3 Gy for organs at risk). Results: The total prescribed dose was about 85 Gy(alpha beta 10) which was mainly achieved by 45 Gy external beam radiotherapy plus 4 X 7 Gy brachytherapy (total 84 Gy(alpha beta 10)). The mean value was 82 Gy(alpha beta 10) for the point A dose (left, right) and 84 cm(3) for the volume of the prescribed dose. The average dose to the clinical target volume was 66 Gy(alpha beta 10) for the minimum target dose, 87 Gy(alpha beta 10) for the dose received by at least 90% of the volume, with a mean volume treated with at least the prescribed dose of 89%. The mean D-2cc for the bladder was 83 Gy(alpha beta 3) the ICRU point dose was 75 Gy(alpha beta 3) and the dose at the ICRU point plus 1.5 cm cranially was 100 Gy(alpha beta 3). The average dose to the rectum was 64 Gy(alpha beta 3) for D-2cc and at ICRU point 69 Gy(alpha beta 3). The sigma D-2cc was 63 Gy(alpha beta 3). Conclusion: A standard loading pattern should be used as the starting point for MRI-based optimization. Individual changes of active dwell positions and dwell weights are guided by a concept of DVH constraints for target and organs at risk. In our clinical routine, the dose to point A and dose received by at least 90% of the volume for the clinical target volume are both comparable to the prescribed dose. The DVH constraints for organs at risk allow reproducible treatment plans, helping to detect and avoid severe overdosage. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:901 / 911
页数:11
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, 50 ICRU
[2]  
[Anonymous], RADIOTHER ONCOL
[3]   MAXIMUM AND MEAN BLADDER DOSE DEFINED FROM ULTRASONOGRAPHY - COMPARISON WITH THE ICRU REFERENCE IN GYNECOLOGICAL BRACHYTHERAPY [J].
BARILLOT, I ;
HORIOT, JC ;
MAINGON, P ;
BONELEPINOY, MC ;
VAILLANT, D ;
FEUTRAY, S .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1994, 30 (03) :231-238
[5]   Variations of intracavitary applicator geometry during multiple HDR brachytherapy insertions in carcinoma cervix and its influence on reporting as per ICRU report 38 [J].
Datta, NR ;
Kumar, S ;
Das, KJM ;
Pandey, CM ;
Halder, S ;
Ayyagari, S .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2001, 60 (01) :15-24
[6]  
Dimopoulos J, 2004, RADIOTHER ONCOL, V71, pS10
[7]  
Erickson B, 2004, RADIOTHER ONCOL, V71, pS9
[8]  
Erickson Beth A, 2003, Brachytherapy, V2, P189, DOI 10.1016/j.brachy.2003.09.001
[9]   Comparison of radiography- and computed tomography-based treatment planning in cervix cancer in brachytherapy with specific attention to some quality assurance aspects [J].
Fellner, C ;
Pötter, R ;
Knocke, TH ;
Wambersie, A .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2001, 58 (01) :53-62
[10]   THE LINEAR-QUADRATIC FORMULA AND PROGRESS IN FRACTIONATED RADIOTHERAPY [J].
FOWLER, JF .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1989, 62 (740) :679-694