Structural Reliability Analysis Using Adaptive Artificial Neural Networks

被引:32
作者
de Santana Gomes, Wellison Jose [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Ctr Optimizat & Reliabil Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Rua Joao Pio Duarte 205, BR-88037000 Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
来源
ASCE-ASME JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY IN ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PART B-MECHANICAL ENGINEERING | 2019年 / 5卷 / 04期
关键词
structural reliability; reliability analysis; surrogate models; artificial neural networks; adaptive experimental designs; RESPONSE-SURFACE; OPTIMIZATION; PERFORMANCE; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1115/1.4044040
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Structural reliability theory has been applied to many engineering problems in the last decades, with the primary objective of quantifying the safety of such structures. Although in some cases approximated methods may be used, many times the only alternatives are those involving more demanding approaches, such as Monte Carlo simulation (MCS). In this context, surrogate models have been widely employed as an attempt to keep the computational effort acceptable. In this paper, an adaptive approach for reliability analysis using surrogate models, proposed in the literature in the context of Kriging and polynomial chaos expansions (PCEs), is adapted for the case of multilayer perceptron (MLP) artificial neural networks (ANNs). The methodology is employed in the solution of three benchmark reliability problems and compared to MCS and other methods from the literature. In all cases, the ANNs led to results very close to those obtained by MCS and required much less limit state function evaluations. Also, the performance of the ANNs was found comparable, in terms of accuracy and efficiency, to the performance of the other methods.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, INTERPOLATION SPATIA
[2]  
[Anonymous], ICVRAM ISUMA UNCERTA
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1987, Proceedings of the Marine Structural Reliability Symposium, SSC/SNAME
[4]  
Beale M.H., 2011, NEURAL NETWORK TOOLB
[5]   Reliability of material and geometrically non-linear reinforced and prestressed concrete structures [J].
Biondini, F ;
Bontempi, F ;
Frangopol, DM ;
Malerba, PG .
COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2004, 82 (13-14) :1021-1031
[6]   An adaptive algorithm to build up sparse polynomial chaos expansions for stochastic finite element analysis [J].
Blatman, Geraud ;
Sudret, Bruno .
PROBABILISTIC ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2010, 25 (02) :183-197
[7]   A comparison of approximate response functions in structural reliability analysis [J].
Bucher, Christian ;
Most, Thomas .
PROBABILISTIC ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2008, 23 (2-3) :154-163
[8]   Review and application of Artificial Neural Networks models in reliability analysis of steel structures [J].
Chojaczyk, A. A. ;
Teixeira, A. P. ;
Neves, L. C. ;
Cardoso, J. B. ;
Guedes Soares, C. .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2015, 52 :78-89
[9]   Global structural optimization considering expected consequences of failure and using ANN surrogates [J].
de Santana Gomes, Wellison Jose ;
Beck, Andre Teofilo .
COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2013, 126 :56-68
[10]   Structural reliability analysis for implicit performance functions using artificial neural network [J].
Deng, J ;
Gu, DS ;
Li, XB ;
Yue, ZQ .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2005, 27 (01) :25-48