Development and validation of an integrative scale to assess hope

被引:66
作者
Schrank, Beate [1 ]
Woppmann, Andreas [2 ]
Sibitz, Ingrid [1 ]
Lauber, Christoph [3 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Psychiat & Psychotherapy, Waehringerguertel, Austria
[2] Univ Vienna, Dept Sociol, Vienna, Austria
[3] Univ Liverpool, Dept Psychiat, Liverpool L69 3BX, Merseyside, England
关键词
development; hope; measurement; scale; validation; INSTRUMENT;
D O I
10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00645.x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Hope includes the dimensions of time, goals, control, relations and personal characteristics. Existing tools that measure it vary in length and psychometric properties and cover different parts of its overall concept. Objectives This study aimed to develop an instrument that integrates all relevant aspects of hope is concise, easy to use and shows good psychometric properties. Design Three pre-existing instruments (Miller Hope Scale, Herth Hope Index, Snyder Hope Scale) covering complementary and overlapping aspects of hope were administered cross-sectionally to a general population sample (n = 489). Factor analysis was used for item reduction. Reliability and validity were tested using factor analysis and item correlations between the new scale and quality of life and depression scales. Setting and participants The study was set in Austria. Participants were sampled from the general population using a quota sampling strategy. Results The initial 60 items were reduced to a 23-item scale with four dimensions: 'trust and confidence', 'positive future orientation', 'social relations and personal value' and 'lack of perspective'. The new scale's factor structure was highly stable and its internal consistency high (alpha = 0.92 for the overall scale, 0.80-0.85 for its subscales). Hope scores were negatively correlated with depression (r = 0.68) and positively with quality of life (r = 0.57), with the factor analysis and item discriminant validity supporting the new scale's construct validity. Conclusions The new scale comprehensively covers the concept of hope is significantly shorter than previous scales and shows satisfactory reliability and validity.
引用
收藏
页码:417 / 428
页数:12
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], Process of translation and adaptation of instruments
  • [2] Longitudinal effects of hope on depression and anxiety: A latent variable analysis
    Arnau, Randolph C.
    Rosen, David H.
    Finch, John F.
    Rhudy, Jamie L.
    Fortunato, Vincent J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2007, 75 (01) : 43 - 63
  • [3] Hope, health work and quality of life in families of stroke survivors
    Bluvol, A
    Ford-Gilboe, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2004, 48 (04) : 322 - 332
  • [4] Bryman A., 2008, Social research method, V3rd
  • [5] Carifio James, 2002, Work, V19, P125
  • [6] Religiosity/Spirituality and Mortality A Systematic Quantitative Review
    Chida, Yoichi
    Steptoe, Andrew
    Powell, Lynda H.
    [J]. PSYCHOTHERAPY AND PSYCHOSOMATICS, 2009, 78 (02) : 81 - 90
  • [7] Costello A., 2005, Pratical Assessment, Research Evaluation, V10, P1
  • [8] Darlington Y., 1999, AUST SOC WORK, V52, P17, DOI 10.1080/03124079908414131
  • [9] Dunteman GeorgeH., 1989, Sage University Papers Series Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences
  • [10] How is patient-centred care understood by the clinical, managerial and lay stakeholders responsible for promoting this agenda?
    Gillespie, R
    Florin, D
    Gillam, S
    [J]. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2004, 7 (02) : 142 - 148