The use of EORTC measures in daily clinical practiced-A synopsis of a newly developed manual

被引:72
作者
Wintner, Lisa M. [1 ]
Sztankay, Monika [1 ]
Aaronson, Neil [2 ]
Bottomley, Andrew [3 ]
Giesinger, Johannes M. [1 ]
Groenvold, Mogens [4 ]
Petersen, Morten Aa [4 ]
van de Poll-Franse, Lonneke [5 ]
Velikova, Galina [6 ]
Verdonck-de Leeuw, Irma [7 ]
Holzner, Bernhard [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Innsbruck, Dept Psychiat Psychotherapy & Psychosomat, Anichstr 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[2] Netherlands Canc Inst, Div Psychosocial Res & Epidemiol, Plesmanlaan 121, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] EORTC Headquarters, Qual Life Dept, Ave E Mounier 83, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
[4] Univ Copenhagen, Bispebjerg Hosp, Dept Palliat Med, Res Unit, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, DK-2400 Copenhagen, Denmark
[5] Netherlands Comprehens Canc Org, Gebouw Janssoenborch,Godebaldkwartier 419, NL-3511 DT Utrecht, Netherlands
[6] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Canc & Pathol, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[7] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Clin Psychol, De Boelelaan 1118, NL-1081 HZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
基金
奥地利科学基金会;
关键词
EORTC Quality of Life Group; Patient-reported outcomes; Quality of life; Neoplasms; Manual; Implementation; Daily clinical routine; Guideline; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES; CANCER-PATIENTS; ONCOLOGY PRACTICE; HEALTH-CARE; NEEDS ASSESSMENTS; PROSTATE-CANCER; PATIENT; IMPACT; IMPROVE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejca.2016.08.024
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Cancer has increasingly become a chronic condition and the routine collection of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) like quality of life is widely recommended for clinical practice. Nonetheless, the successful implementation of PROs is still a major challenge, although common barriers to and facilitators of their beneficial use are well known. To support health care professionals and other stakeholders in the implementation of the EORTC PRO measures, the EORTC Quality of Life Group provides guidance on issues considered important for their use in daily clinical practice. Herein, we present an outline of the newly developed "'Manual for the use of EORTC measures in daily clinical practice", covering the following issues: * a rationale for using EORTC measures in routine care *selection of EORTC measures, timing of assessments, scoring and presentation of results * aspects of a strategic implementation * electronic data assessment and telemonitoring, and * further use of EORTC measures and ethical considerations. Next to an extensive overview of currently available literature, the manual specifically focuses on knowledge about EORTC measures to give evidence-based recommendations whenever possible and to encourage readers and end-users of EORTC measures to contribute to further needed high-quality research. The manual will be accessible on the EORTC Quality of Life Group website's homepage and will be periodically updated to take into account any new knowledge due to medical, technical, regulatory and scientific advances. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 81
页数:9
相关论文
共 98 条
[11]   Electronic patient-reported outcome systems in oncology clinical practice [J].
不详 .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2012, 62 (05) :336-347
[12]  
Bero LA, 1998, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V317, P465
[13]   The science of improvement [J].
Berwick, Donald M. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2008, 299 (10) :1182-1184
[14]   Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare [J].
Black, Nick .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 346
[15]   The experiences of professionals with using information from patient-reported outcome measures to improve the quality of healthcare: a systematic review of qualitative research [J].
Boyce, Maria B. ;
Browne, John P. ;
Greenhalgh, Joanne .
BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2014, 23 (06) :508-518
[16]   An international prospective study of the EORTC cancer in-patient satisfaction with care measure (EORTC IN-PATSAT32) [J].
Brédart, A ;
Bottomley, A ;
Blazeby, JM ;
Conroy, T ;
Coens, C ;
D'Haese, S ;
Chie, WC ;
Hammerlid, E ;
Arraras, JI ;
Efficace, F ;
Rodary, C ;
Schraub, S ;
Costantini, M ;
Costantini, A ;
Joly, F ;
Sezer, O ;
Razavi, D ;
Mehlitz, M ;
Bielska-Lasota, M ;
Aaronson, NK .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2005, 41 (14) :2120-2131
[17]   Communicating quality of life information to cancer patients: A study of six presentation formats [J].
Brundage, M ;
Feldman-Stewart, D ;
Leis, A ;
Bezjak, A ;
Degner, L ;
Velji, K ;
Zetes-Zanatta, L ;
Tu, D ;
Ritvo, P ;
Pater, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (28) :6949-6956
[18]   Communicating patient-reported outcome scores using graphic formats: results from a mixed-methods evaluation [J].
Brundage, Michael D. ;
Smith, Katherine C. ;
Little, Emily A. ;
Bantug, Elissa T. ;
Snyder, Claire F. .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2015, 24 (10) :2457-2472
[19]   Development, feasibility and compliance of a web-based system for very frequent QOL and symptom home self-assessment after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation [J].
Bush, N ;
Donaldson, G ;
Moinpour, C ;
Haberman, M ;
Milliken, D ;
Markle, V ;
Lauson, J .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2005, 14 (01) :77-93
[20]   Key factors influencing adoption of an innovation in primary health care: a qualitative study based on implementation theory [J].
Carlfjord, Siw ;
Lindberg, Malou ;
Bendtsen, Preben ;
Nilsen, Per ;
Andersson, Agneta .
BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2010, 11