Contextualism and the factivity problem

被引:17
作者
Baumann, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB9 1FX, Scotland
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1933-1592.2008.00158.x
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
Epistemological contextualism - the claim that the truth-value of knowledge-attributions can vary with the context of the attributor - has recently faced a whole series of objections. The most serious one, however, has not been discussed much so far: the factivity objection. In this paper, I explain what the objection is and present three different versions of the objection. I then show that there is a good way out for the contextualist. However, in order to solve the problem the contextualist has to accept a relationalist version of contextualism.
引用
收藏
页码:580 / 602
页数:23
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ACTA ANAL
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, SKEPTICS CONT ESSAYS
[3]  
Bach Kent., 2005, CONTEXTUALISM PHILOS, P51
[4]   An invalid argument for contextualism [J].
Blackson, TA .
PHILOSOPHY AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2004, 68 (02) :344-345
[5]  
Brendel E, 2003, DEUT Z PHILOS, V51, P1015
[6]   Contextualism, Hawthorne's invariantism and third-person cases [J].
Brueckner, A .
PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY, 2005, 55 (219) :315-318
[7]   The elusive virtues of contextualism [J].
Brueckner, A .
PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES, 2004, 118 (03) :401-405
[8]  
CAPPELEN H, 2003, PHILOS PERSPECT, V17, P25, DOI DOI 10.1111/j.1520-8583.2003.00002.x
[9]   KNOWLEDGE, CONTEXT, AND SOCIAL STANDARDS [J].
COHEN, S .
SYNTHESE, 1987, 73 (01) :3-26
[10]   Knowledge, speaker and subject [J].
Cohen, S .
PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY, 2005, 55 (219) :199-212