Propofol auto-co-induction as an alternative to midazolam co-induction for ambulatory surgery

被引:17
作者
Djaiani, G [1 ]
Ribes-Pastor, MP [1 ]
机构
[1] Morriston Hosp, Dept Anaesthet, Swansea SA6 6NL, W Glam, Wales
关键词
anaesthetics; intravenous; propofol; surgery; day case;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2044.1999.00658.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
We propose the use of an intravenous propofol/propofol auto-co-induction technique as an alternative to propofol/midazolam for induction of anaesthesia. We have studied 54 unpremedicated ASA 1 or 2 patients undergoing day-stay anaesthesia for minor orthopaedic surgery. All received 10 mu g.kg(-1) of alfentanil before induction, followed by either midazolam 0.05 mg.kg(-1), propofol 0.4 mg.kg(-1) or saline, and 2 min later, a propofol infusion at a rate of 50 mg.kg(-1).h(-1) until loss of eyelash reflex. We compared pre- and postinduction haemodynamic changes, complications at insertion of a laryngeal mask airway and recovery from anaesthesia in the three groups. Both co-induction techniques showed less postinduction hypotension and significant reduction of the total induction dose of propofol when compared to the control group. In the propofol/propofol group there was a decreased incidence of apnoea during induction of anaesthesia. These patients were discharged from hospital 2 h after the end of anaesthesia whereas patients in the midazolam/propofol group were discharged after 2 1/2 h (p < 0.001).
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 67
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   HEMODYNAMIC-RESPONSE TO INDUCTION AND INTUBATION [J].
BILLARD, V ;
MOULLA, F ;
BOURGAIN, JL ;
MEGNIGBETO, A ;
STANSKI, DR .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1994, 81 (06) :1384-1393
[2]  
Chassard D, 1996, BRIT J ANAESTH, V76, pA25
[3]   A COMPARATIVE-EVALUATION OF PROPOFOL AND MIDAZOLAM AS SEDATIVE AGENTS IN FIBEROPTIC BRONCHOSCOPY [J].
CLARKSON, K ;
POWER, CK ;
OCONNELL, F ;
PATHMAKANTHAN, S ;
BURKE, CM .
CHEST, 1993, 104 (04) :1029-1031
[4]  
De Lucia JA, 1992, ANESTH ANALG, V74, pS63
[5]   Midazolam co-induction and laryngeal mask insertion [J].
Driver, IK ;
Wiltshire, S ;
Mills, P ;
Lillywhite, N ;
HowardGriffin, R .
ANAESTHESIA, 1996, 51 (08) :782-784
[6]   MIDAZOLAM COINDUCTION DOES NOT DELAY DISCHARGE AFTER VERY BRIEF PROPOFOL ANESTHESIA [J].
ELWOOD, T ;
HUCHCROFT, S ;
MACADAMS, C .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1995, 42 (02) :114-118
[7]   HEMODYNAMIC-EFFECTS OF PROPOFOL - INDUCTION WITH 2.5 MG KG-1 [J].
FAIRFIELD, JE ;
DRITSAS, A ;
BEALE, RJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1991, 67 (05) :618-620
[8]  
GODSIFF L, 1995, EUR J ANAESTH, V12, P35
[9]  
Harris C E, 1988, Anaesthesia, V43 Suppl, P32, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1988.tb09065.x
[10]  
HUG CC, 1993, ANESTH ANALG, V76, pS154