Stakeholder's opinion of public participation in Thai environmental and health impact assessment

被引:13
作者
Kantamaturapoj, Kanang [1 ]
Piyajun, Ganda [2 ]
Wibulpolprasert, Suwit [3 ]
机构
[1] Mahidol Univ, Fac Social Sci & Humanities, Dept Social Sci, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand
[2] Off Nat Resources & Environm Policy & Planning, Dept Social Sci, Environm Impact Evaluat Bur, Bangkok, Thailand
[3] Int Hlth Policy Program, Dept Social Sci, Nonthaburi, Thailand
关键词
Public participation; public consultation; environmental and health impact assessment; EHIA: Environmental and Health Impact Assessment; Thailand; EIA; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1080/14615517.2018.1491172
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper evaluates the efficacy of public participation in the EHIA (environmental and health impact assessment) process of Thailand based on the opinions of 53 interviewees from various stakeholder groups in relation to certain public participation criteria. The evaluation revealed that public participation in Thai EHIA was partially effective. The project proponents provide an opportunity to anybody interested in the project to get involved from the scoping stage onwards. However, the important decisions are already made before the public can get involved. In addition, government officers and non-governmental organizations appear to be able to influence outcomes of public hearings more concretely than the project-affected people due to the highly technical nature of the discussions. The stakeholders were questioned whether their concerns were taken seriously during the decisionmaking process. In our conclusions, we make three major recommendations to enhance the public participation process and practice in Thai EHIA, based upon: (1) stakeholder analysis, (2) public participation in EHIA guideline revision, and (3) validation the authenticity of the concerns raised by stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页码:429 / 441
页数:13
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   Perceptions of communication in Norwegian forest management [J].
Aasetre, J .
FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2006, 8 (01) :81-92
[2]  
ABELSON J, 2001, FINAL REPORT BRANT C
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, J ENV L PRAC
[4]  
Appleton K., 2005, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, V29, P321, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2004.05.005
[5]   THE CONCEPT OF SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC-DEVELOPMENT [J].
BARBIER, EB .
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 1987, 14 (02) :101-110
[6]   Public Hearing or 'Hearing Public'? An Evaluation of the Participation of Local Stakeholders in Environmental Impact Assessment of Ghana's Jubilee Oil Fields [J].
Bawole, Justice Nyigmah .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2013, 52 (02) :385-397
[7]  
Beierle T.C., 1998, PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
[8]   Evaluating public participation in Chinese EIA. An integrated Public Participation Index and its application to the case of the New Beijing Airport [J].
Brombal, Daniele ;
Moriggi, Angela ;
Marcomini, Antonio .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2017, 62 :49-60
[9]   Stakeholder analysis: a review [J].
Brugha, R ;
Varvasovszky, Z .
HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, 2000, 15 (03) :239-246
[10]   Designing Public Participation Processes [J].
Bryson, John M. ;
Quick, Kathryn S. ;
Slotterback, Carissa Schively ;
Crosby, Barbara C. .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2013, 73 (01) :23-34