Reengineering the patient's environment: Establishment of a "Red Box" to improve communications with patients on isolation precautions

被引:5
作者
Malhotra, Prashant [1 ]
Khameraj, Aradhana [2 ]
Salim, Tanzila [1 ]
Armellino, Donna [3 ]
Wirostek, Susan [4 ]
Epstein, Marcia E. [1 ]
Farber, Bruce F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hofstra Northwell, Dept Med, Div Infect Dis, Donald & Barbara Zucker Sch Med, 400 Community Dr, Manhasset, NY 11030 USA
[2] North Shore Univ Hosp, Dept Infect Control, Manhasset, NY USA
[3] Northwell Hlth, Infect Prevent, Lake Success, NY USA
[4] North Shore Univ Hosp, Dept Nursing, Manhasset, NY USA
关键词
Personal protective equipment; Patient satisfaction; Health care-associated infection; Infection prevention; Patient safety; CONTACT PRECAUTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajic.2018.09.007
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Hospitalized patients on isolation precautions are reported to have less frequent health care provider (HCP) visits owing to time required to don and doff personal protective equipment (PPE). Thus, placement on isolation precautions leads to negative patient perception and affects their care. Methods: A "Red Box" that extended 3 feet beyond the door was marked in 50 patient rooms of a tertiary care hospital and used for patient communication by HCPs without PPE. HCP and patient perceptions of the Red Box were studied via a survey and personal interviews. Compliance was also observed by "secret shoppers." Rates of health care-associated infections (HAIs) were monitored. Results: Over a 1-year period, HCPs reported improved patient communication, utilization of time, and increased interactions. HCPs used the Red Box to communicate with patients 76% of the time. In 92% of the cases, HCPs remembered not to use PPE while in the Red Box and were observed 80% of the time using PPE when venturing beyond the Red Box. Patients reported improved frequency of HCP contact and satisfaction. HAIs in these units did not show any increase compared with those in prior years. Conclusions: HCP interaction and communication with patients on isolation precautions improved with the reengineering of the patient environment in the form of the Red Box. HAI rates did not increase with this intervention. (C) 2018 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:264 / 267
页数:4
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Adverse effects of isolation in hospitalised patients: a systematic review [J].
Abad, C. ;
Fearday, A. ;
Safdar, N. .
JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2010, 76 (02) :97-102
[2]  
Barratt R, 2010, AUST J ADV NURS, V28, P53
[3]   Patient experience of source isolation: Lessons for clinical practice [J].
Barratt, Ruth Linda ;
Shaban, Ramon ;
Moyle, Wendy .
CONTEMPORARY NURSE, 2011, 39 (02) :180-193
[4]  
Blomberg D., 2014, AM J INFECT CONTRO S, V42, P80
[5]  
Butterfield S., YET ANOTHER USE DUCT
[6]   Contact Precautions: More Is Not Necessarily Better [J].
Dhar, Sorabh ;
Marchaim, Dror ;
Tansek, Ryan ;
Chopra, Teena ;
Yousuf, Adnan ;
Bhargava, Ashish ;
Martin, Emily T. ;
Talbot, Thomas R. ;
Johnson, Laura E. ;
Hingwe, Ameet ;
Zuckerman, Jerry M. ;
Bono, Bartholomew R. ;
Shuman, Emily K. ;
Poblete, Jose ;
Tran, MaryAnn ;
Kulhanek, Grace ;
Thyagarajan, Rama ;
Nagappan, Vijayalakshmi ;
Herzke, Carrie ;
Perl, Trish M. ;
Kaye, Keith S. .
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 35 (03) :213-221
[7]  
Douglas J., 2015, The TQM Journal, V27, P705, DOI DOI 10.1177/0539018406069584
[8]  
Franck JN., 2011, AM J INFECT CONTROL, V39, pE208
[9]   Adverse effects of contact isolation [J].
Kirkland, KB ;
Weinstein, JM .
LANCET, 1999, 354 (9185) :1177-1178
[10]  
Knowles H E, 1993, Nurs Times, V89, P53