Attention Restoration Theory: A systematic review of the attention restoration potential of exposure to natural environments

被引:508
作者
Ohly, Heather [1 ]
White, Mathew P. [1 ]
Wheeler, Benedict W. [1 ]
Bethel, Alison [2 ]
Ukoumunne, Obioha C. [2 ]
Nikolaou, Vasilis [2 ]
Garside, Ruth [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Exeter, European Ctr Environm & Human Hlth, Sch Med, Royal Cornwall Hosp, Truro Campus & Knowledge Spa, Truro TR1 3HD, Cornwall, England
[2] Univ Exeter, NIHR CLAHRC South West Peninsula, Sch Med, St Lukes Campus, Exeter, Devon, England
来源
JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH-PART B-CRITICAL REVIEWS | 2016年 / 19卷 / 07期
关键词
DECISION-MAKING; SELF-CONTROL; BENEFITS; RESOURCE; CHILDREN; VIEWS; BRAIN;
D O I
10.1080/10937404.2016.1196155
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Attention Restoration Theory (ART) suggests the ability to concentrate may be restored by exposure to natural environments. Although widely cited, it is unclear as to the quantity of empirical evidence that supports this. A systematic review regarding the impact of exposure to natural environments on attention was conducted. Seven electronic databases were searched. Studies were included if (1) they were natural experiments, randomized investigations, or recorded before and after measurements; (2) compared natural and nonnatural/other settings; and (3) used objective measures of attention. Screening of articles for inclusion, data extraction, and quality appraisal were performed by one reviewer and checked by another. Where possible, random effects meta-analysis was used to pool effect sizes. Thirty-one studies were included. Meta-analyses provided some support for ART, with significant positive effects of exposure to natural environments for three measures (Digit Span Forward, Digit Span Backward, and Trail Making Test B). The remaining 10 meta-analyses did not show marked beneficial effects. Meta-analysis was limited by small numbers of investigations, small samples, heterogeneity in reporting of study quality indicators, and heterogeneity of outcomes. This review highlights the diversity of evidence around ART in terms of populations, study design, and outcomes. There is uncertainty regarding which aspects of attention may be affected by exposure to natural environments.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 343
页数:39
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, METHODS META ANAL ME
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies
[3]  
[Anonymous], SYSTEMATIC REV CRDS
[4]   The strength model of self-control [J].
Baumeister, Roy F. ;
Vohs, Kathleen D. ;
Tice, Dianne M. .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2007, 16 (06) :351-355
[5]   Interacting with nature improves cognition and affect for individuals with depression [J].
Berman, Marc G. ;
Kross, Ethan ;
Krpan, Katherine M. ;
Askren, Mary K. ;
Burson, Aleah ;
Deldin, Patricia J. ;
Kaplan, Stephen ;
Sherdell, Lindsey ;
Gotlib, Ian H. ;
Jonides, John .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2012, 140 (03) :300-305
[6]   The Cognitive Benefits of Interacting With Nature [J].
Berman, Marc G. ;
Jonides, John ;
Kaplan, Stephen .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2008, 19 (12) :1207-1212
[8]   Does the outdoor environment matter for psychological restoration gained through running? [J].
Bodin, M ;
Hartig, T .
PSYCHOLOGY OF SPORT AND EXERCISE, 2003, 4 (02) :141-153
[9]   A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments [J].
Bowler, Diana E. ;
Buyung-Ali, Lisette M. ;
Knight, Teri M. ;
Pullin, Andrew S. .
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2010, 10
[10]  
[陈聪 Chen Cong], 2011, [中国心理卫生杂志, Chinese Mental Health Journal], V25, P681