Clustering and Negative Feedback by Endocytosis in Planar Cell Polarity Signaling Is Modulated by Ubiquitinylation of Prickle

被引:43
作者
Cho, Bomsoo [1 ]
Pierre-Louis, Gandhy [1 ,2 ]
Sagner, Andreas [3 ]
Eaton, Suzanne [3 ]
Axelrod, Jeffrey D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Pathol, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Dev Biol, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Max Planck Inst Mol Cell Biol & Genet, Dresden, Germany
关键词
F-BOX PROTEIN; TISSUE POLARITY; VAN-GOGH; DROSOPHILA; GENE; STRABISMUS; FLAMINGO; ENCODES; DIEGO; ESTABLISHMENT;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pgen.1005259
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
The core components of the planar cell polarity (PCP) signaling system, including both transmembrane and peripheral membrane associated proteins, form asymmetric complexes that bridge apical intercellular junctions. While these can assemble in either orientation, coordinated cell polarization requires the enrichment of complexes of a given orientation at specific junctions. This might occur by both positive and negative feedback between oppositely oriented complexes, and requires the peripheral membrane associated PCP components. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying feedback are not understood. We find that the E3 ubiquitin ligase complex Cullin1(Cul1)/SkpA/Supernumerary limbs(Slimb) regulates the stability of one of the peripheral membrane components, Prickle (Pk). Excess Pk disrupts PCP feedback and prevents asymmetry. We show that Pk participates in negative feedback by mediating internalization of PCP complexes containing the transmembrane components Van Gogh (Vang) and Flamingo (Fmi), and that internalization is activated by oppositely oriented complexes within clusters. Pk also participates in positive feedback through an unknown mechanism promoting clustering. Our results therefore identify a molecular mechanism underlying generation of asymmetry in PCP signaling.
引用
收藏
页数:29
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   The domineering non-autonomy of frizzled and Van Gogh clones in the Drosophila wing is a consequence of a disruption in local signaling [J].
Adler, PN ;
Taylor, J ;
Charlton, J .
MECHANISMS OF DEVELOPMENT, 2000, 96 (02) :197-207
[2]  
Adler PN, 2000, GENESIS, V28, P82, DOI 10.1002/1526-968X(200010)28:2<82::AID-GENE60>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-Z
[4]   Cell Flow Reorients the Axis of Planar Polarity in the Wing Epithelium of Drosophila [J].
Aigouy, Benoit ;
Farhadifar, Reza ;
Staple, Douglas B. ;
Sagner, Andreas ;
Roeper, Jens-Christian ;
Juelicher, Frank ;
Eaton, Suzanne .
CELL, 2010, 142 (05) :773-786
[5]   Mathematical modeling of planar cell polarity to understand domineering nonautonomy [J].
Amonlirdviman, K ;
Khare, NA ;
Tree, DRP ;
Chen, WS ;
Axelrod, JD ;
Tomlin, CJ .
SCIENCE, 2005, 307 (5708) :423-426
[6]   Modeling the control of planar cell polarity [J].
Axelrod, Jeffrey D. ;
Tomlin, Claire J. .
WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-SYSTEMS BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2011, 3 (05) :588-605
[7]   Strabismus is asymmetrically localised and binds to Prickle and Dishevelled during Drosophila planar polarity patterning [J].
Bastock, R ;
Strutt, H ;
Strutt, D .
DEVELOPMENT, 2003, 130 (13) :3007-3014
[8]   An optimized transgenesis system for Drosophila using germ-line-specific φC31 integrases [J].
Bischof, Johannes ;
Maeda, Robert K. ;
Hediger, Monika ;
Karch, Francois ;
Basler, Konrad .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2007, 104 (09) :3312-3317
[9]   The SCF ubiquitin ligase: Insights into a molecular machine [J].
Cardozo, T ;
Pagano, M .
NATURE REVIEWS MOLECULAR CELL BIOLOGY, 2004, 5 (09) :739-751
[10]  
Chae J, 1999, DEVELOPMENT, V126, P5421