Temporal Patterns of Cervical Cancer Screening Among Danish Women 55 Years and Older Diagnosed With Cervical Cancer

被引:12
作者
Hammer, Anne [1 ,2 ]
Hee, Lene [3 ]
Blaakaer, Jan [4 ,5 ]
Gravitt, Patti [6 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Palle Juul Jensens Blvd 99, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
[2] George Washington Univ, Dept Global Med, Washington, DC USA
[3] Hilleroed Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Hillerod, Denmark
[4] Odense Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Odense, Denmark
[5] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Clin Med, Odense, Denmark
[6] George Washington Univ, Dept Global Hlth, Washington, DC USA
关键词
cervical cancer; cervical cancer screening; epidemiology; age; HISTORY; TRENDS; STAGE; RISK; TOOL;
D O I
10.1097/LGT.0000000000000351
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of the study was to describe the screening history in postmenopausal women diagnosed with cervical cancer during 1990-2013 by age and screening period. Materials and Methods : This hospital-based cohort study included women 55 years and older diagnosed with cervical cancer at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark, during 1990-2013. Information on their previous history of cervical cancer screening was obtained from the Danish Pathology Databank. Results: Overall, 47.0% (95% CI = 42.6-51.4) had no record of screening before their cervical cancer diagnosis. This proportion declined over calendar time from 69.8% (95% CI = 61.4-77.3) in 1990-1994 to 20.0% (95% CI = 12.7-29.2) in 2010-2013 and increased by age from 22.5% (95% CI = 14.6-32.0) in women aged 55 to 59 years to 63.2% (95% CI = 49.3-75.6) in women 80 years and older. Cases living in the organized screening era (i.e., birth cohorts 1943-1960) were more likely to have a record of screening than women in the preorganized screening era (i.e., birth cohorts 1901-1942) (p < .001). Of all cases, 17.7% (n = 91) had a record of screening within 5 years of diagnosis and the proportion was highest in the most recent periods and in women aged 55 to 64 years. Of cases with a record of screening within 5 years, 84.6% (95% CI = 14.5-21.2) had a normal cytology result, whereas only 8.8% (95% CI = 2.9-14.7) had high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or worse. Conclusions: Cervical cancer in older women may partly be attributed to a lack of screening or due to a failure in screening. However, older women were in general less screened because screening was unavailable.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 7
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks:: Evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden [J].
Andrae, Bengt ;
Kemetli, Levent ;
Sparen, Par ;
Silfverdal, Lena ;
Strander, Bjorn ;
Ryd, Walter ;
Dillner, Joakim ;
Tornberg, Sven .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2008, 100 (09) :622-629
[2]  
[Anonymous], Dansk Kvalitetsdatabase for Mammografiscreening Arsrapport 2019: Femte Nationale Screeningsrunde (Danish Quality Database for Mammography Screening Annual Report 2019: Fifth National Screening Round)
[3]  
[Anonymous], SCREEN CERV CANC
[4]  
[Anonymous], NYE KRAEFTT DANM CAN
[5]   Trends in the incidence of cervical cancer and severe precancerous lesions in Denmark, 1997-2012 [J].
Baldur-Felskov, Birgitte ;
Munk, Christian ;
Nielsen, Thor Schutt Svane ;
Dehlendorff, Christian ;
Kirschner, Benny ;
Junge, Jette ;
Kjaer, Susanne K. .
CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2015, 26 (08) :1105-1116
[6]   Cervical cancer screening in Denmark [J].
Bigaard, J ;
Hariri, J ;
Lynge, E .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2000, 36 (17) :2198-2204
[7]   Nonattendance is still the main limitation for the effectiveness of screening for cervical cancer in the Netherlands [J].
Bos, Anita B. ;
Rebolj, Matejka ;
Habbema, J. Dik F. ;
van Ballegooijen, Marjolein .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2006, 119 (10) :2372-2375
[8]   Trends in cervical squamous cell carcinoma incidence in 13 European countries: Changing risk and the effects of screening [J].
Bray, F ;
Loos, AH ;
McCarron, P ;
Weiderpass, E ;
Arbyn, M ;
Moller, H ;
Hakama, M ;
Parkin, DM .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2005, 14 (03) :677-686
[9]   Patients with cervical cancer: why did screening not prevent these cases? [J].
de Bie, Roosmarie P. ;
Vergers-Spooren, Henke C. ;
Massuger, Leon F. A. G. ;
Siebers, Albertus G. ;
Salet-van der Pol, Maria R. J. ;
Vedder, Judith E. M. ;
Melchers, Willem J. G. ;
Bulten, Johan ;
Bekkers, Ruud L. M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 205 (01) :64.e1-64.e7
[10]   Human papillomavirus genotype attribution in invasive cervical cancer: a retrospective cross-sectional worldwide study [J].
de Sanjose, Silvia ;
Quint, Wim G. V. ;
Alemany, Laia ;
Geraets, Daan T. ;
Ellen Klaustermeier, Jo ;
Lloveras, Belen ;
Tous, Sara ;
Felix, Ana ;
Eduardo Bravo, Luis ;
Shin, Hai-Rim ;
Vallejos, Carlos S. ;
Alonso de Ruiz, Patricia ;
Lima, Marcus Aurelho ;
Guimera, Nuria ;
Clavero, Omar ;
Alejo, Maria ;
Llombart-Bosch, Antonio ;
Cheng-Yang, Chou ;
Alejandro Tatti, Silvio ;
Kasamatsu, Elena ;
Iljazovic, Ermina ;
Odida, Michael ;
Prado, Rodrigo ;
Seoud, Muhieddine ;
Grce, Magdalena ;
Usubutun, Alp ;
Jain, Asha ;
Hernandez Suarez, Gustavo Adolfo ;
Estuardo Lombardi, Luis ;
Banjo, Aekunbiola ;
Menendez, Clara ;
Javier Domingo, Efren ;
Velasco, Julio ;
Nessa, Ashrafun ;
Chichareon, Saibua C. Bunnag ;
Qiao, You Lin ;
Lerma, Enrique ;
Garland, Suzanne M. ;
Sasagawa, Toshiyuki ;
Ferrera, Annabelle ;
Hammouda, Doudja ;
Mariani, Luciano ;
Pelayo, Adela ;
Steiner, Ivo ;
Oliva, Esther ;
Meijer, Chris J. L. M. ;
Al-Jassar, Waleed Fahad ;
Cruz, Eugenia ;
Wright, Thomas C. ;
Puras, Ana .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2010, 11 (11) :1048-1056