Measuring systemic risk: A risk management approach

被引:225
作者
Lehar, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vienna, Dept Business Studies, A-1210 Vienna, Austria
关键词
systemic risk; financial stability; risk management;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbankfin.2004.09.007
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper proposes a new method to measure and monitor the risk in a banking system. Standard tools that regulators require banks to use for their internal risk management are applied at the level of the banking system to measure the risk of a regulator's portfolio. Using a sample of international banks from 1988 until 2002, 1 estimate the dynamics and correlations between bank asset portfolios. To obtain measures for the risk of a regulator's portfolio, I model the individual liabilities that the regulator has to each bank as contingent claims on the bank's assets. The portfolio aspect of the regulator's liability is explicitly considered and the methodology allows a comparison of sub-samples from different countries. Correlations, bank asset volatility, and bank capitalization increase for North American and somewhat for European banks, while Japanese banks face deteriorating capital levels. In the sample period, the North American banking system gains stability while the Japanese banking sector becomes more fragile. The expected future liability of the regulator varies substantially over time and is especially high during the Asian crisis starting in 1997. Further analysis shows that the Japanese banks contribute most to the volatility of the regulator's liability at that time. Larger and more profitable banks have lower systemic risk and additional equity capital reduces systemic risk only for banks that are constrained by regulatory capital requirements. (c) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2577 / 2603
页数:27
相关论文
共 53 条
[31]   Effectiveness of capital regulation at US commercial banks, 1985 to 1994 [J].
Hovakimian, A ;
Kane, EJ .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2000, 55 (01) :451-468
[32]  
Jorion P., 2000, VALUE RISK
[33]   THE BRAZILIAN DEFAULT ANNOUNCEMENT AND THE CONTAGION EFFECT HYPOTHESIS [J].
KARAFIATH, I ;
MYNATT, R ;
SMITH, KL .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 1991, 15 (03) :699-716
[34]  
KAUFMAN G, 2000, FINANCIAL MARKETS I, V9
[35]  
KRAINER J, 2001, 0114 FED RES BANK SA
[36]  
Kupiec Paul., 1995, J DERIV, V3, P73, DOI [DOI 10.3905/JOD.1995.407942, 10.3905/jod.1995.407942]
[37]  
LAEVEN L, 2002, BANKING RISKS AROUND
[38]   REACTION OF BRITISH BANK SHARE PRICES TO CITICORPS ANNOUNCED 3 BILLION DOLLARS INCREASE IN LOAN-LOSS RESERVES [J].
MADURA, J ;
WHITE, AM ;
MCDANIEL, WR .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 1991, 15 (01) :151-163
[39]  
Merton R.C., 1977, Journal of Banking Finance, V1, P3
[40]   THEORY OF RATIONAL OPTION PRICING [J].
MERTON, RC .
BELL JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1973, 4 (01) :141-183