A new lexicon for polypharmacy: Implications for research, practice, and education

被引:27
作者
Gillette, Chris [1 ]
Prunty, Leesa [1 ]
Wolcott, Janet [1 ]
Broedel-Zaugg, Kimberly [1 ]
机构
[1] Marshall Univ, Sch Pharm, Dept Pharm Practice Adm & Res, Huntington, WV 25755 USA
关键词
Polypharmacy; Pharmacy; Research; Education; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.sapharm.2014.08.010
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Previous research suggests that polypharmacy is a significant challenge for health care systems. However, polypharmacy has been defined in at least 24 distinct ways, which has understandably caused confusion among researchers, educators, and students in health care. Previous definitions of polypharmacy capture what could be both inappropriate therapy, i.e. too many medications, as well as evidence-based therapy that is appropriate. Previous research has tried to focus on the number of medications a patient is prescribed to define polypharmacy; however only focusing on the number of medications a patient is taking may be of limited value in determining whether that patient will experience an adverse event. This paper proposes a lexicon change for polypharmacy. It suggests that in future research, polypharmacy be defined as patients going to more than one pharmacy for their prescriptions. The authors also proffer a new term, 'extraordinary prescribing,' to define patients who are taking medications that are either grossly excessive or not beneficial for that patient. This definition is different than the current use of polypharmacy because the number of medications a patient is taking is irrelevant, especially if that patient has multiple chronic diseases. This paper is meant to start a dialog within the health services research community to inform future research that examines why inefficient prescribing may harm patients and the broader health care system. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:468 / 471
页数:4
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2014
    不详
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2014, 37 : S14 - S80
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2008, J ALLERGY CLIN IMMUN
  • [3] Electronic health records: Just around the corner? Or over the cliff?
    Baron, RJ
    Fabens, EL
    Schiffman, M
    Wolf, E
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 143 (03) : 222 - 226
  • [4] Appropriateness in health care: Application to prescribing
    Buetow, SA
    Sibbald, B
    Cantrill, JA
    Halliwell, S
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1997, 45 (02) : 261 - 271
  • [5] Polypharmacy: Misleading, but manageable
    Bushardt, Reamer L.
    Massey, Emily B.
    Simpson, Temple W.
    Ariail, Jane C.
    Simpson, Kit N.
    [J]. CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS IN AGING, 2008, 3 (02) : 383 - 389
  • [6] The Definition and Prevalence of Pediatric Psychotropic Polypharmacy
    Chen, Hua
    Patel, Ankur
    Sherer, Jeffrey
    Aparasu, Rajender
    [J]. PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2011, 62 (12) : 1450 - 1455
  • [7] Polypharmacy: In search of an appropriate term
    Cozanitis, Dimitri A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION, 2011, 51 (05) : 569 - 569
  • [8] Dovjak P, 2012, Z GERONTOL GERIATR, V45, P468, DOI 10.1007/s00391-012-0362-y
  • [9] Fulton Maryann M, 2005, J Am Acad Nurse Pract, V17, P123, DOI 10.1111/j.1041-2972.2005.0020.x
  • [10] Polypharmacy cutoff and outcomes: five or more medicines were used to identify community-dwelling older men at risk of different adverse outcomes
    Gnjidic, Danijela
    Hilmer, Sarah N.
    Blyth, Fiona M.
    Naganathan, Vasi
    Waite, Louise
    Seibel, Markus J.
    McLachlan, Andrew J.
    Cumming, Robert G.
    Handelsman, David J.
    Le Couteur, David G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2012, 65 (09) : 989 - 995