Dexmedetomidine-remifentanil or propofol-remifentanil anesthesia in patients undergoing intracranial surgery

被引:3
|
作者
Günes, Y [1 ]
Gündüz, M [1 ]
Özcengiz, D [1 ]
Özbek, H [1 ]
Isik, G [1 ]
机构
[1] Cukurova Univ, Fac Med, Dept Anesthesiol, TR-01330 Adana, Turkey
关键词
dexmedetomidine; propofol; remifentanil; intracranial surgery;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Dexmedetomidine has been shown to provide good perioperative hemodynamic stability with decreased intraoperative opioid requirements. This study was conducted to compare the effect of dexmedetomidine-remifentanil (DR) anesthesia and propofol-remifentanil (PR) anesthesia on perioperative hemodynamics and postanesthesia. recovery profiles in patients undergoing intracranial surge After receiving Ethics Committee approval and informed patient consent, 78 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II patients between the ages of 19 and 70 years with a Glasgow Coma Scale score 14 or 15 who were scheduled for elective intracranial surgery with general anesthesia were recruited. Anesthesia induction was provided by intravenous remifentanil (0.5 mu g/kg) and propofol (1.5-2 mg/kg) in both groups and maintained with infusion of DR (0.6-1.2 mg/kg/h and 0.25 mu g/kg/min)-nitrous oxide/oxygen (n(2)o/o(2)) in the DR group (n = 39) and infusion of PR (3-10 mg/kg/h and 0.25 mu g/kg/min)-n(2)o/o(2) in the PR group (n = 39). Hemodynamic variables were recorded before surgery, during the induction of anesthesia, after intubation, and during application of the headholder and skin incision; brain relaxation was also recorded. Times to extubation and awakening, eye opening, and response to commands as well as analgesic requirements were recorded after surgery. No significant difference was found in systolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure throughout the study period except at the time of the dural incision (P < 0.05). These variables were significantly lower in the DR group (P < 0.05). Brain relaxation scores were similar between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). Time to extubation was significantly shorter in patients receiving PR anesthesia than in patients receiving DR anesthesia (3.6 minutes vs. 5.5 minutes). Analgesic requirements were significantly higher in the PR group than in the DR group (P = 0.013). No significant side effects were reported in the 2 groups (P > 0.05). In conclusion, dexmedetomidine (0.6-1.2 mu g/kg(-1)/h(-1)) Plus remifentanil (0.25 mu g/kg(-1) min(-1)) anesthesia offered lower analgesic requirements, a longer extubation time, and better hemodynamic stability compared with PR anesthesia for patients undergoing intracranial surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:122 / 126
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Quality differences in postoperative sleep between propofol-remifentanil and sevoflurane anesthesia in infants
    Steinmetz, Jacob
    Holm-Knudsen, Rolf
    Eriksen, Kirsten
    Marxen, Dorte
    Rasmussen, Lars S.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2007, 104 (04): : 779 - 783
  • [42] Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanil sedation for obese patients undergoing cataract surgery
    Altiparmak, Basak
    Celebi, Nalan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2016, 9 (07): : 14728 - 14733
  • [43] Glucose response during craniotomy: propofol-remifentanil versus isoflurane-remifentanil
    Cok, O. Y.
    Ozkose, Z.
    Pasaoglu, H.
    Yardim, S.
    MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2011, 77 (12) : 1141 - 1148
  • [44] Effect of rocuronium and sugammadex under stable propofol-remifentanil anesthesia on the (processed) electroencephalogram
    Federico, Linassi
    Duygu, Aydin
    Paolo, Zanatta
    Gerhard, Schneider
    Matthias, Kreuzer
    Michele, Carron
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING, 2025,
  • [45] Comparison of respiratory mechanics between sevoflurane and propofol-remifentanil anesthesia for laparoscopic colectomy
    Bang, Si Ra
    Lee, Sang Eun
    Ahn, Hyun Joo
    Kim, Jie Ae
    Shin, Byung Seop
    Roe, Hee Jin
    Sim, Woo Seog
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2014, 66 (02) : 131 - 135
  • [46] Effect of palonosetron on postanesthetic shivering after propofol-remifentanil total intravenous anesthesia
    Jo, Youn Yi
    Kwak, Hyun Jeong
    Lee, Mi Geum
    Lim, Oh Kyung
    JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, 2013, 27 (04) : 535 - 540
  • [47] Maintenance of anesthesia in morbidly obese patients using propofol with continuous BIS-monitoring : a comparison of propofol-remifentanil and propofol-epidural anesthesia
    van Kralingen, S.
    van de Garde, E. M. W.
    van Dongen, E. P. A.
    Diepstraten, J.
    Deneer, V. H. M.
    van Ramshorst, B.
    Knibbe, C. A. J.
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA BELGICA, 2011, 62 (02) : 73 - 82
  • [48] The effect of propofol-remifentanil anesthesia on selected seizure quality indices in electroconvulsive therapy
    Dinwiddie, Stephen H.
    Glick, David B.
    Goldman, Morris B.
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2012, 5 (03) : 402 - 407
  • [49] Propofol-remifentanil or sevoflurane for children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging? A randomised study
    Pedersen, N. A.
    Jensen, A. G.
    Kilmose, L.
    Olsen, K. S.
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2013, 57 (08) : 988 - 995
  • [50] Consistency of remifentanil concentrations in propofol-Remifentanil infusions. A laboratory-based study
    Wylie, Nicole
    Beale, Lee
    Westley, Ian
    PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2022, 32 (06) : 727 - 731