Dutch version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)

被引:519
作者
van Widenfelt, BM
Goedhart, AW
Treffers, PDA
Goodman, R
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Child & Adolescent Psychiat Curium, NL-2342 AK Oegstgeest, Netherlands
[2] Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat, Dept Child & Adolescent Psychiat, London WC2R 2LS, England
关键词
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire; screening; psychometric properties; Dutch children;
D O I
10.1007/s00787-003-0341-3
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
A Dutch translation of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) was made. In the first wave of data collection, self-report data of 11- to 16-yearolds (N=970) were collected on the SDQ and other measures of psychopathology. In the second wave of data collection, extended versions of the SDQ were completed by 11- to 16-year-olds (N=268), by parents of 8- to 16-year-olds (N=300) and by teachers of 8- to 12-year-olds (N=208); in addition, the Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) was completed by the parents and the Youth Self Report (YSR) by the 11- to 16-year-olds. The results reveal that the internal consistency of the teacher SDQ is good; and the parent and self-report SDQ are generally acceptable and comparable with the internal consistencies of CBCL/YSR. The mean inter-informant product-moment correlations of the SDQ scales were satisfactory (parent-teacher 0.38; teacher-self-report 0.27; parent-self-report 0.35) and comparable with the mean inter-informant correlations of the CBCL and YSR (0.34). The inter-informant rank correlations of the impact questions were also satisfactory (mean parent-teacher 0.48; mean parent-self-report 0.24). Concurrent validity with the other measures of psychopathology used in the present study was good.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 289
页数:9
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Achenbach T., 1991, Manual for the youth self-report and 1991 profile
[2]  
Achenbach T.M., 1991, MANUAL CHILD BEHAV C
[3]   CHILD ADOLESCENT BEHAVIORAL AND EMOTIONAL-PROBLEMS - IMPLICATIONS OF CROSS-INFORMANT CORRELATIONS FOR SITUATIONAL SPECIFICITY [J].
ACHENBACH, TM ;
MCCONAUGHY, SH ;
HOWELL, CT .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1987, 101 (02) :213-232
[4]  
Cohen J., 1998, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, V2nd
[5]  
Goodman R, 1999, J CHILD PSYCHOL PSYC, V40, P791, DOI 10.1017/S0021963099004096
[6]   The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: A research note [J].
Goodman, R .
JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY AND ALLIED DISCIPLINES, 1997, 38 (05) :581-586
[7]   Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire [J].
Goodman, R .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2001, 40 (11) :1337-1345
[8]   Comparing the strengths and difficulties questionnaire and the child behavior checklist: Is small beautiful? [J].
Goodman, R ;
Scott, S .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 27 (01) :17-24
[9]   DEVELOPMENT OF A STRUCTURED PSYCHIATRIC INTERVIEW FOR CHILDREN - AGREEMENT BETWEEN CHILD AND PARENT ON INDIVIDUAL SYMPTOMS [J].
HERJANIC, B ;
REICH, W .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 1982, 10 (03) :307-324
[10]   Comparing the German versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ-Deu) and the Child Behavior Checklist [J].
Klasen, H ;
Woerner, W ;
Wolke, D ;
Meyer, R ;
Overmeyer, S ;
Kaschnitz, W ;
Rothenberger, A ;
Goodman, R .
EUROPEAN CHILD & ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2000, 9 (04) :271-276